loss of control is a partial defence to murder and if successful the defendant will be found guilty of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder.
what section is loss of control established in?
s54 of Coroners and Justice Act 2009
s54 (1) Coroners and Justice Act 2009:
where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, D is not to be convicted of murder if;
D's acts or omissions resulted form a loss of control.
the loss of control had a qualifying trigger
person of D's sex or age might have reacted the same or in a similar way to D
burden of proof for loss of control is on the defendant.
firstly it must be proven that D had a loss of self control. This is a matter for the jury to decide and it must be a total loss of control.
R V Jewell- unable to think straight was insufficient.
under s54(2) the loss of control doesn't need to be sudden as previously seen in the defence of provocation (R V Ahluwalia)
s55 sets out the qualifying triggers for loss of control;
fear of serious violence(s55(3))
things said or done which either constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character or caused D to have a justifiable sense of being wronged. (s55(4))
There could also be a combination of the two qualifying triggers (s55(5))
fear of serious violence s55(3) - R V Dawes
they instigated the violence meaning they cannot rely on the qualifying trigger.
things done or said s55(4) - R V Zebedee
D lost control after looking after his ill father and killed him. Jury found that this wasn't a qualifying trigger.
under provocation, sexual infidelity was a qualifying trigger uner loss of control. - R V Clinton.
a desire for revenge isnt considered under s54(4) - R V Baillie
under s54(1)(c) it is necessary for D to show that someone of d's sex or age may have reacted in the same way.
s54(1)(c)- it is necessary to show that a person of D's sex or age with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint and in the circumstances of D might have reacted in the same or similar way to D'