loss of control

Cards (14)

  • loss of control is a partial defence to murder and if successful the defendant will be found guilty of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder.
  • what section is loss of control established in?
    s54 of Coroners and Justice Act 2009
  • s54 (1) Coroners and Justice Act 2009:
    where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, D is not to be convicted of murder if;
    1. D's acts or omissions resulted form a loss of control.
    2. the loss of control had a qualifying trigger
    3. person of D's sex or age might have reacted the same or in a similar way to D
  • burden of proof for loss of control is on the defendant.
  • firstly it must be proven that D had a loss of self control. This is a matter for the jury to decide and it must be a total loss of control.
    R V Jewell- unable to think straight was insufficient.
  • under s54(2) the loss of control doesn't need to be sudden as previously seen in the defence of provocation (R V Ahluwalia)
  • s55 sets out the qualifying triggers for loss of control;
    • fear of serious violence(s55(3))
    • things said or done which either constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character or caused D to have a justifiable sense of being wronged. (s55(4))
  • There could also be a combination of the two qualifying triggers (s55(5))
  • fear of serious violence s55(3) - R V Dawes
    they instigated the violence meaning they cannot rely on the qualifying trigger.
  • things done or said s55(4) - R V Zebedee
    D lost control after looking after his ill father and killed him. Jury found that this wasn't a qualifying trigger.
  • under provocation, sexual infidelity was a qualifying trigger uner loss of control. - R V Clinton.
  • a desire for revenge isnt considered under s54(4) - R V Baillie
  • under s54(1)(c) it is necessary for D to show that someone of d's sex or age may have reacted in the same way.
  • s54(1)(c)- it is necessary to show that a person of D's sex or age with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint and in the circumstances of D might have reacted in the same or similar way to D'
    An objective test for the jury to consider