Qualitative data is non-numerical data that describes qualities,experiences, or opinions.
Quantitative data is numerical data that can be measured and analysedstatistically.
Strengths of qualitative data:
Rich, in-depth detail β Provides insight into thoughts,emotions, and experiences.
Greater external validity β Provides more real-life, meaningful insight that numbers are unable to do.
Weaknesses of qualitative data:
Difficult to analyse statistically β Cannot easily compare large datasets.
Subjective interpretation β Can be influenced by researcher bias.
Strengths of quantitative data:
Easier to analyse and compare β Allows for statistical testing (e.g., averages, correlations).
More reliable β Less open to researcherbias and more objective.
Weaknesses of quantitative data:
Lacks depth β Does not explain why participants behave in a certain way.
Can oversimplify behaviour β Ignores complexity (e.g., reducing mental health to a number).
Primary data is data collected first-hand by the researcher for their specific study.
It is gathered directly from the participants as part of an experiment, self-report or observation.
Secondary data is data that has already been collected by someone else and is then used by a researcher.
Such data already exists before the investigation and may include the work of other psychologists (journals, books etc.) or governmentstatistics.
Strengths of primary data:
Fits the research aim β Designed specifically for the studyβs purpose.
Up-to-date and relevant β More reliable than using old research.
Weaknesses of primary data:
Time-consuming and expensive β Requires more effort to collect as an experiment needs to be conducted, for example, which requires considerable planning,preparation and resources.
May have smallsample sizes β Harder to generalise findings.
Strengths of secondary data:
Quick and cost-effective β Saves time as data is already available.
Large samplesizes β Often more representative than primary data.
Weaknesses of secondary data:
May not be specific to research aims β Data may be outdated or irrelevant.
Lack of control β The original study may have used biased methods or is incomplete.