Osborne and West - father with a criminal conviction 40% of sons had committed a crime by the age of 18, compared to 13% with non criminal fathers
Aksers et al -most important influences on drink and drug behaviour was from peers
Studies are consistent with the predictions of differential association theory that offending behaviour is learned through associations and interactions with others who have less favourable attitudes towards crime
Diff. Association AO3 - Correlational research
Data from supportive evidence is correlational
May be that offenders seek out other offenders rather than being influenced by them
Osborne and West’s results could just as easily be explained by genetics as differential association
This means that from the research internal validity of differential association theory is questioned because cause and effect cannot be determined
Diff. Association AO3 - Real world app.
Differential association theory draws attention to the fact that dysfunctional social circumstances and environments may be more to blame for criminality than dysfunctional people, as was advocated by atavistic form
The theory marked an important shift from ‘blaming’ individual factors to pointing to social factors
This approach is more desirable because it offers a more realistic solution to the problem of crime (as learning environments can be changes) instead of eugenics
If a person regards it as unacceptable to rob someone but acceptable to falsify tax returns, what does this illustrate according to Differential Association Theory?