What study did Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg conduct?
They conducted a meta-analysis of 32 other pieces of research that all used the Strange Situation test. They want to find out whether there were intra or inter differences in cultures/
What does Intra, Inter and Meta-analysis mean?
Intra: Within one culture
Inter: Between different cultures
Meta-analysis: Findings from multiple pieces of already existing research are assessed to identify trends and patterns
All countries were predominantly type B (securely attached). However, some countries had higher levels of type A/type C than other, what were they?
Germany – higher levels of type A (insecure-avoidant): 35%.
Japan – higher levels of type C (insecure-resistant): 27%.
Israel – higher levels of type C (insecure-resistant): 29%.
More information about Germany
They value distance between the infant and their mother
Proximity and seeking behaviour are often discouraged
More information about Japan
Not often separated from their mothers (if they are, infants are extremely distressed).
Spend almost 100% of their time with their mother for the first 2 years of their lives.
More information about Israel
Children live in a Kibbutz – shared community
Parents would visit infants for 3 hours per day after work
High STA but low SEA
What is Individualist culture?
Emphasises the importance of independence and achievement (Germany, USA, UK)
What is Collectivist culture?
Emphasises the importance of family and shared goals above independent needs and goods (Israel, China, Japan)
What is a strength of Van Ijzendoorn's research?
Meta-analysis study
He utilised a meta-analysis of 32 studies - very large sample increases the validity of the findings
What is the counter argument of 'meta-analysis study' of Van Ijzendoorn's research?
18/32 of the meta-analysis studies were from US
No studies represented attachment in Africa, South America and socialist Eastern European countries = lacks generalisability
What is a limitation of Van Ijzendoorn's research?
Strange situation uses imposed etic
The results of the strange situation were from 108 American middle-class infants – it isn’t fair to make judgements about non-American countries = lacks generalisability
What is a limitation of Van Ijzendoorn's research?
Impact of confounding variables
Studies conducted in differentcountries may not be matched for sample characteristics (different ages/social classes)
Environmental variables may also differ (different size rooms)
Therefore, research might tell us little about cultural differences