Specific: Phobia of specific objects/situations (e.g., medical procedures)
Social: Phobia of a social situation (e.g., public speaking)
Agoraphobia: Phobia of being outside/public space
What are characteristics of phobias?
Behaviours, emotional and cognitive
What is the 2-process method for behavioural explanation of phobias?
Stage 1: acquisition through classical conditioning
Stage 2: maintenance through operant conditioning
What happens in stage 1: classical conditioning - Little Albert?
Bang (UCS) = fear (UCR)
Rat (NS) = no fear (no response)
Bang (UCS) + rat (NS) = fear (UCR)
Rat (CS) = fear (CR)
What happens in stage 2: operant conditioning?
Maintenance of phobic behaviours occurs with negative reinforcement – removal of something negative that increases the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated (removing phobia to increase calmness)
The avoidance of a frightful stimulus (e.g., someone scared of dogs: when she becomes scared, she avoids the dog which takes away her anxiety)
What is a strength of the 2-process method?
Usefulness/applications - behavioural treatments
Not only does this explanation tell us how a phobia can occur, but it can also help us treat them. For example, exposure therapies somewhat reverse the 2-process method. It attempts to break down the associations and also teaches patients relaxation techniques to face their fears. Therefore, this explanation has useful applications to the real world
What is the counter argument for 'usefulness/application' of the 2-way process?
It has been found that exposure therapy is 90%, meaning this doesn't work on all patients. therefore, there must be a further or more detailed explanation of phobias
What is a strength of the 2-process method?
Supporting evidence - research support
Little Albert was used in a classical conditioning experiment which gave him a phobia of rats = increases validity
What is the counter argument for 'supporting research' of the 2-way process method?
Little Albert was a case study, which means it was small scale. Therefore, it isn’t generalisable to a whole population.
What is a limitation of the 2-process method?
Other explanations/treatments - biological preparedness
Selegman (1970) believed that humans are programmed to fear life-threatening stimulus to protect ourselves (nurture vs nature)
What is a limitation of the 2-process method?
Conflicting evidence - not every fearful events leads to phobia
Di Nardo (1988) did research into the phobia of dogs (Cynophobia) and found that around 40% that have cynophobia didn’t have a negative experience with a dog
What is a limitation of the 2-process method?
Issues and debates - deterministic
The 2-process model suggests that when an individual experiences a traumatic event and uses this event to draw an association between a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned response, they will go on and develop a phobia. this suggests we are programmed by environmental experiences and ignores free will, however we know this isn't true (e.g., not everyone bitten by a dog develops a phobia)