Kobasa = proposed hardiness is a set of personality characteristics that protect us against stress
Maddi = argues that hardiness gives us ‘existential courage’ (the determination to keep going despite set backs life throws at us and uncertainties about the future)
3 dimensions of hardiness
Commitment = hardy people deeply involve themselves in relationships and activities. They throw themselves wholeheartedly into life, optimistic they will learn something valuable
Challenge = hardy people are resilient and welcome change as an opportunity rather than a threat. They recognise life is unpredictable, but this is exciting
Control = hardy people have a strong belief that they are in charge of events. They actively strive to influence environments rather than being passive
Kobasa hardiness and stress study (procedure)
Kobasa measured life changes of 670 male American middle and senior managers (aged 40-49 years)
Used schedule of recent experiences to identify who experienced high stress over previous 3 years
Also analysed absenteeism records and levels of illness
Kobasa hardiness and stress study (findings/conclusions)
Managers responded to same stress very differently
Some were more resilient = they coped with higher stressful jobs without becoming ill or taking time off work
These resilient managers scored highly on the 3 Cs, confirming the role of hardiness
Maddi hardiness at work study (procedure)
Maddi studied 400 managers and supervisors at the Bell Telephone company in the US over several years
The Bell Telephone company underwent one of the biggest reorganisations in American corporate history when thousands of people lost their jobs
Also extremely stressful experience for those who stayed
Maddi hardiness at work study (findings/conclusions)
~2/3 of pps = significant declines in performance and health (eg heart attacks, strokes, depression and drug abuse)
1/3 of managers = scored highly on measures of the 3Cs and flourished
Their health did not deteriorate, they felt happier and more fulfilled at work and were rejuvenated by the whole stressful experience
strength = hardiness has application in the real world
Bartone et al = measured hardiness in candidates for US Army Special Forces (a highly stressful job with a tough selection course)
Those who passed the course were significantly hardier than those who failed (elite US military units now routinely select hardy people)
=> knowledge of hardiness might be useful in certain jobs to predict who can resist stress and who cannot
strength = evidence to support hardiness
Contrada = looked at cardiovascular responses to a stressful lab task
pps who scored highest on hardiness had lower resting blood pressure
The lowest blood pressure was found in pps who were hardy and had a type B personality (interaction between personality characteristics)
Shows that hardiness affects the physiological stress response and may protect from some stress-related illnesses
counterpoint to evidence supporting hardiness
Contarada’s study used five measures of hardiness, indicating that it is a poorly defined concept (only the challenge component was linked to blood pressure)
Suggests that much research into hardiness, stress and illness is based on measures that lack validity
limitation = concept of hardiness may be too broad
Hull et al = argued that research should focus on control, as research shows it is so important to well-being (and to a lesser extent, commitment)
BUT = Contrada claims that challenge is the most important component of hardiness
Suggest the concept of hardiness is so broad it has very little validity and may not exist at all
extra evaluation = direct or indirect effects
Hardiness may have direct beneficial effects on health = hardy people under stress have a reduced level of physiological arousal
BUT = the effects of hardiness could be indirect (eg hardy people may be more motivated to behave in healthy ways)
Means it doesn’t matter whether the effects are direct or indirect because hardiness is beneficial either way and should be developed through training