Johnson and Scott, anxiety has a negative effect (procedure)
Participants sat in a waiting room believing they were going to take part in a lab study
Low-anxiety condition = participants heard a casual conversation, then saw a man walk through the waiting room carrying a pen with grease on his hands
High-anxiety condition = a heated argument was accompanied by the sound of breaking glass. A man then walked through the room holding a knife covered in blood (creates anxiety and ‘weapon focus’)
Participants were later asked to pick the man from a set of 50 photographs
Johnson and Scott, anxiety has a negative effect (findings/conclusions)
49% of participants in the low-anxiety condition and 33% of high-anxiety participants were able to identify the man
Tunnel theory of memory = argues that people have enhanced memory for central events
Weapon focus as a result of anxiety can have this effect
Weapon focus = witness’s attention focused on weapon leading to less attention on other details of the event
Yuille and Cutshall, anxiety has a positive effect (procedure)
In an actual crime, a gun-shop owner shot a thief dead
13 out of the 22 witnesses agreed to participate in the study
participants were interviewed 4-5 months after the incident
The information recalled was compared to the police interviews at the time of the shooting
Witnesses also rated how stressed they felt at the time of the incident
Yuille and Cutshall, anxiety has a positive effect (findings/conclusions)
Witnesses were very accurate in what they recalled and there was little change after 5 months
Some details were less accurate = eg age, weight, height
Participants who reported the highest levels of stress were most accurate
About 88% compared to 75% for the less stressed group
Anxiety does not appear to reduce the accuracy of EWT for a real-world event and may even enhance it
Explaining the contradictory findings of anxiety
Inverted-U theory
Yerkes and Dodson = argues that the relationship between performance and arousal/stress is an inverted U
Performance will increase with stress but only to a certain optimum point, and then performance will decrease
Deffenbacher = revised 21 studies of EWT with contradictory findings on the effects of anxiety on recall
He suggested the Yerkes-Dodson effect could explain this = both low and high levels of anxiety produce poor recall whereas optimum levels can lead to very good recall
limitation = anxiety may not be relevant to weapon focus
Johnson and Scott’s participants may have focused on the weapon not because they were anxious but because they were surprised
Pickel = found accuracy in identifying the ‘criminal’ was poorest when the object in their hand was unexpected
Eg = raw chicken and a gun in a hairdressers (both unusual)
This suggests the weapons effect is due to unusualness rather than anxiety/threat and so tells us nothing about the specific effects of anxiety on recall
strength = supporting evidence for negative effects
Valentine and Mesout = used heart rate (objective measure) to divide visitors to the London Dungeon’s Labyrinth into low- and high-anxiety groups
High-anxiety participants were less accurate than low-anxiety in describing and identifying a target person
This supports the claim that anxiety has a negative effect on immediate eyewitness recall of a stressful event
Strength = supporting evidence for positive effects
Christianson and Hubinette = interviewed actual witnesses to bank robberies
Some were direct victims (high anxiety) and others were bystanders (less anxiety)
They found more than 75% accurate recall across all witnesses
Direct victims (most anxious) were even more accurate
Suggests that anxiety does not affect the accuracy of eyewitness recall and may even enhance it
counterpoint to supporting evidence for positive effects
Christianson and Hubinette = interviewed witnesses long after the event
Many things happened that the researchers could not control (eg post-event discussions)
=> lack of control over confounding variables may be responsible for the (in)accuracy of recall, not anxiety
extra evaluation = problems with the inverted-U theory
The inverted-U theory appears to be a reasonable explanation of the contradictory findings linking anxiety with both increased and decreased eyewitness recall
BUT = it only focuses on physical anxiety and ignores other elements, including cognitive (how we think about a stressful event affects what we recall)
=> the invert-U explanation is probably too simplistic to be useful (eg anxious thoughts may not always lead to symptoms of anxiety but may block memory)