systematic desensitisation (SD) = involves gradually increasing exposure to the feared stimuli until it no longer induces anxiety
flooding (F) = involves exposing the subject to the most extreme scenarios straight away
based on classical conditioning (SD)
therapy aims to gradually reduce anxiety through counterconditioning:
phobia is learned so that phobic stimulus (CS) produces fear (CR)
CS is paired with relaxation and this becomes the new CR
reciprocal inhibition = not possible to be afraid and relaxed at the same time, so one emotion prevents the other
formation of anxiety hierarchy (SD)
client and therapist design an anxiety hierarchy - fearful stimuli arranged in order from least to most frightening
a person with arachnophobia might identify seeing a picture of a small spider as low on their anxiety hierarchy and holding a tarantula as the final item
relaxation practiced at each level of the hierarchy (SD)
person with phobia is first taught relaxation techniques (such as deep breathing and/or meditation)
person then works through the anxiety hierarchy
at each level the person is exposed to the phobic stimulus in a relaxed state
this takes place over several sessions, starting at the bottom of the hierarchy
treatment is successful when the person can stay relaxed in high-anxiety situations
strength = evidence of effectiveness (SD)
Gilroy et al = followed up to 42 people who had SD for spider phobia
at follow up, the SD group were less fearful than a control group
Wechsler et al = concluded that SD is effective for specific phobia, social phobia and agoraphobia
means that SD is likely to be helpful for people with phobias
strength = usefulness for people with learning disabilities (SD)
main alternatives to SD are unsuitable for people with learning disabilities
eg = cognitive therapies require a high level of rational thought and flooding is distressing
SD does not require understanding or engagement on a cognitive level and is not a traumatic experience
means that SD is often the most appropriate treatment for some people
limitation = timely and requires motivation (SD)
SD therapies have to take place over multiple sessions
with the sessions becoming even more intense (anxiety hierarchy) the patient may lose motivation to continue
=> SD may not be as effective as thought for all patients
immediate exposure to the phobic stimulus (F)
flooding involves exposing a person with a phobia with the phobic object without a gradual build up
eg = a person with arachnophobia receiving flooding treatment may have a large spider crawl over their hand until they can relax fully (person not spider)
extremely quick learning through extinction (F)
without the option of avoidance = the person quickly learns that the phobic object is harmless through the exhaustion of their fear response (called exhaustion)
ethical safeguards (F)
flooding is not unethical but it is an unpleasant experience - so it is important that people being treated give informed consent
they must be fully prepared and know what to expect
strength = cost effective (F)
a therapy is described as cost effective if it is clinically effective and not expensive (flooding can work as little as one session)
even with a longer session (eg 3 hours) this makes more cost-effective than alternatives
=> more people can be treated at the same cost by flooding than by SD or other therapies
limitation = it is traumatic (F)
Schumacher et al = found that both pps and therapists rated flooding as more stressful than SD
=> there are ethical concerns about knowingly causing stress (offset by informed consent), and the traumatic nature of flooding also leads to higher attrition rates than for SD
suggests that overall therapists may avoid using this treatment
extra evaluation = symptom substitution (F)
behavioural therapies do not treat causes so symptoms reappear (eg Persons found that a woman with death phobia which turned into a fear of criticism)
BUT = the only evidence for symptom substitution comes in the form of case studies which may not generalises to all cases and phobias
means that symptom substitution is largely a theoretical idea and there is only relatively poor empirical evidence to support it