agrees with the behaviourist approach that learning occurs through experience
BUT he also proposed that learning takes place in a social context through observation and imitation of others' behaviour
also allows for the inclusion of cognitive elements (e.g.mediating processes) in explaining behaviour
learning related to consequences of behaviour
children (and adults) observe other people's behaviour and take note of its consequences
vicarious reinforcement = behaviour that is seen to be rewarded (reinforced) is more likely to be copied
mediational (cognitive) processes
attention = whether behaviour is noticed
retention = whether behaviour is remembered/retained
motor reproduction = being able to physically reproduce behaviour
motivation = the will and motivation to perform/imitate the behaviour
first 2 relate to learning, last 2 relate to performance
=> unlike behaviourism, learning and performance don't have to occur together
mediating processes play a crucial role in learning
identification and modelling
identification with role models is important
people are more likely to imitate the behaviour of those with whom they identify
such role models are similar to the observer, attractive and have high status
modelling (observer's perspective) = imitating the behaviour of a role model
modelling (role model's perspective) = demonstrating behaviour that may be imitated
Bandura's research (procedure)
Bandura et al
children watched either:
an adult behaving aggressively towards a bobo doll
an adult behaving non-aggressively towards a bobo doll
Bandura and Walters
children saw adult who was:
rewarded
punished
no consequence
Bandura's research (findings/conclusions)
Bandura et al
when given their own doll to play with, the children who had seen aggression were much more aggressive towards the doll
Bandura and Walters
when given their own doll, the children who saw the aggression rewarded were much more aggressive themselves
the bobo doll studies suggest that children are likely to imitate (model) acts of violence if they observe these in an adult role model
it is also the case that modelling aggressive behaviour is more likely if such behaviour is seen to be rewarded (vicarious reinforcement)
Strength = SLT emphasis the importance of cognitive factors
Neither classical or operant conditioning can offer a comprehensive account of human learning on their own because cognitive factors are omitted
Humans and animals store information about the behaviour of others and use this to make judgements about when it is appropriate to perform certain actions
Shows that SLT provides a more complete explanation of human learning than the behaviourist approach by recognising the role of mediational processes
counterpoint to emphasising importance of cognitive factors
recent research suggests that observational learning is controlled by mirror neurons in the brain, which allow us to empathise with and imitate other people
suggests that SLT may make too little reference to the influence of biological factors on social learning
limit = SLT relies too heavily on evidence from contrived lab studies
many of Bandura's ideas were developed through observation of children's behaviour in lab settings and this raises the problem of demand characteristics
the main purpose of the bobo doll is to hit it
=> the children in those studies may have been behaving as they thought was expected
=> the research may tell us little about how children actually learn aggression in everyday life
strength = RWA
social learning principles can account for how children learn from other people around them, as well as through the media, and this can explain how cultural norms are transmitted
this has proved useful in understanding a range of behaviours
such as how children come to understand their gender role by imitating role models in the media
this increases the value of SLT as it can account for real-world behaviour
extra evaluation = reciprocal determinism
Bandura emphasised reciprocal determinism = we are influenced by our environment, but we also exert an influence upon it through the behaviours we choose to perform
this element of choice suggests there is some free will in the way we behave
this is a more realistic and flexible position than is suggested by the behaviourist approach as it recognises the role we play in shaping out own environment