the cognitive approach is the scientific study of mental processes (eg studying perception and memory)
Direct contrast to the behaviourist approach
Role of interference in the study of mental processes
Mental processes are private and cannot be observed
Cognitive psychologists study them indirectly by making inferences (assumptions) about what is going on inside people’s heads on the basis of their behaviour
idea of schema (central to the cognitive approach)
Schema = packages of information developed through experience
they act as a ‘mental framework’ for the interpretation of incoming information received by the cognitive system
Babies are born with simple motor schema for innate behaviours (such as sucking and grasping)
As we get older our schema become more detailed and sophisticated
Theoretical models to explain mental processes
The information processing approach suggests that information flows through a sequence of stages that include input, storage and retrieval
explains how information flows through various components for processing
Eg = the multi-store model of memory
computer models to explain mental processes
Cognitive approach often thinks of mental processes as comparable to computer processes
Data goes in, gets processed, then an output comes out (input from your senses is processed by the mind to produce an output)
Computer models refer to programmes that can be run on a computer to imitate the human mind (eg conversational machines to deal with consumer enquiries)
By running such a programme psychologists can test their ideas about information processing
Also = the processing steps can be broken down into theoretical models, which can be tested against observation to see if they are accurate
emergence of cognitive neuroscience
Cognitive neuroscience = the scientific study of the influence of brain structures (neuro) on mental processes (cognition)
With advances in brain scanning technology (eg fMRI) in recent years, scientists have been able to describe the neurological basis of mental processing
eg = research in memory that has linked episodic and semantic memories to opposite sides of the prefrontal cortex in the brain (Tulving et al)
Scanning techniques have also proved useful in establishing the neurological basis of some disorders
Eg the parahippocampal gyrus for OCD
Strength = cognitive approach uses scientific and objective methods
Cognitive psychologists have always employed controlled and rigorous methods of study
Eg lab studies in order to infer cognitive processes at work
Also the 2 fields of biology and cognitive psychology have come together (cognitive neuroscience) to enhance the scientific basis of study
Means that the study of the mind has established a credible, scientific basis
counterpoint to scientific and objective methods
The use of interference means cognitive psychology can occasionally be too abstract and theoretical
Also research often uses artificial stimuli ( eg word lists)
=> research on cognitive processes may lack external validity and no represent everyday experience
strength = application to everyday life
The cognitive approach is dominant in psychology today and has been applied to a wide range of practical and theoretical contexts
Eg = artificial intelligence (AI), development of robots, the treatment of depression, improving EWT
This supports the value of the cognitive approach
limitation = approach based on machine reductionism
Although there are similarities between the operations of the human mind and computers (inputs-outputs, central processor, storage systems) the computer analogy has been criticised
for instance = emotion and motivation have been shown to influence accuracy of recall (eg in eyewitness accounts)
These factors are no considered within the computer analogy
Suggests that machine reductionism may weaken the validity of the cognitive approach
extra evaluation = soft determinism
The cognitive approach recognises that our cognitive system operates within certain limits, but we are free to make decisions before responding to stimulus (soft determinism)
This is in contrast to the behaviourists approach which suggests we are passive to the environment and lack free choice in our behaviour
Suggests that the cognitive approach takes a more flexible middle-ground position and is more in line with our subjective sense of free will