External changes in the environment (exogenous zeitgebers)
circadian rhythms:
about one cycle every 24 hours
Eg = sleep/wake cycle
sleep/wake cycle governed by internal and external mechanisms:
EZs = the fact we feel drowsy when it’s night-time and alert during the day shows the effect of daylight
EPs = a biological clock ‘left to its own devices‘ without the influence of external stimuli (eg light) is called ‘free-running’
The basic rhythm is governed by the SCN = which lies above the optic chiasm which provides information from the eyes about light
EZs (eg light) can reset the the SCN
Siffre demonstrated a free-running circadian rhythm of about 25 hours:
French caver Siffre spent long periods in dark caves to examine the effects of free-running biological clocks
2 months AND 6 months
In each case study = Siffre’s free-running circadian rhythm settled down to about 25 hours AND he had a regular sleep/wake cycle
Aschoff and Wever found a similar circadian rhythm:
A group of participants spent 4 weeks in a WW2 bunker deprived of natural light
All but one (whose sleep/wake cycle extended to 29 hours) displayed a circadian rhythm between 24 and 25 hours
Siffre’s experience and the bunker study suggest that the ‘natural’ sleep/wake cycle may be slightly longer than 24 hours but is entrained by EZs associated with our 24-hour day (eg daylight hours, mealtimes)
Folklard et al = showed EPs stronger than EZs
He studied a group of 12 people who lived in a dark caves for 3 weeks = going to bed when clock said 11:45 pm and waking up when it said 7:45 am
unbeknown to the participants = the researchers gradually sped up the clock to a 22-hour day
Only one participant comfortably adjusted to the new regime
This suggests the existence of a strong free-runnning circadian rhythm not controlled by EZs
strength = application to shift work
Shift work creates desynchronisation of biological rhythms
Bolvin et al = found shift workers experienced a lapse of concentration 6 am (a circadian trough) so accidents are more likely
Research also suggests a link between shift workers and poor health = with shift workers 3 times more likely to develop heart disease
=> research into sleep/wake cycle may have economic implications in terms of how best to manage shift work
counterpoint to application to shift work
The research is correlational
=> desynchronisation may not be the cause of observed difficulties
Eg = Solomon concluded that high divorce rates in shift workers might be due to missing out on important family events
Suggests that it may not be biological factors that create the adverse consequences associated with shift work.
strength = RWA to medical treatment
Circadian rhythms co-ordinate the body’s basic process (eg heart rate, hormone levels) with implications for chronotherapeutics (timing medication to maximise the effects on the body)
Aspirin reduces heart attacks = which are most likely in the morning
Bonten et al = found taking aspirin is most effective last ting at night
Shows that circadian rhythm research can help increase the effectiveness of drug treatments
limitation = generalisations are difficult to make (idiographic approach)
Studies of the sleep/wake cycle often use small groups of participants (eg Aschcoff and Wever) or even single individuals (eg Siffre)
Participants may not be representative of the wider population and this limits making meaningful generalisations
Siffre observed that his internal clock ticked much more slowly at 60 than when he was younger
Suggests that, even when the same person is involved, there are factors that may prevent general conclusions being drawn
extra evaluation = shifting the school day
Research showed benefits for teenagers‘ academic and behavioural performance when lessons start later in the day
BUT = a later start is disruptive for parents and teachers AND teenagers may simply stay up later and still be exhausted
Suggests that changing the school day may not be practical even though it may be desirable