No direct control and wide range of competing interest
Pluralist approach to media content
need for circulation and audience figures and profits means content is what audience (not owners) want
role of media managers and journalists according to pluralists
have high level of independence, so long as they attract audiences and therefore profits
pluralist view of audience
Active- makes choices between media and can accept, reject, reinterpret or ignore media content. Not passive
Criticisms of pluralist approach
Journalists are not fully independent
Not all groups of society have equalpower to Influence
Only rich people / groups can compete
Audience tastes are shaped by the elite
Rise of “infotainment“ reduces choice
Why are journalists not fully independent
They work within certain constraints placed on them by owners and can be sacked by influential editors when they are uncooperative
why do not all groups in society have equal power to influence
the main sources of information tend to be from the most powerful and influential groups of society. They are most likely to be interviewed on TV, quoted in newspapers - their views are given more weight than those of the less powerful
why is it that only the rich people can compete
they are the only ones who have the resources to launch major media companies- this means that it is usually the interests of wealthy people that are projected or justified in the media
how are audience tastes shaped by the elite
hegemonictheorists argue that the media have socialised people into believing that they are being given what they want
How has the rise of “infotainment” reduced consumer choice
Media produces content that has mass appeal in order to attract audiences due to competition