assumes a universally shared innate understanding of basic moral principles- does not factor in cultural and individual differences in moral intuitions and values
what is a criticism of ratio
reason alone is not sufficient for explaining complex moral dilemmas- does not account for emotions, cultural context and personal experiences- oversimplifies the intricacies of ethical situations
what is a criticism of conscientia
overly optimistic- external factors e.g societal pressure, emotional states and personal biases play a role- becomes a subjective and potentially flawed moral judgements
what is a criticism of of ignorance
too idealistic- individuals may have different capacities to overcome their ignorance- it becomes blurry and subject to interpretation
