What is a strength for Tulving’s Stores of Long Term Memory?
Real World Application
Understanding long term memory allows psychologists to help people with memory problems
Belleville et al (2006) planned to improve episodic memory in older people in which the trained participants did better on a test of episodic memory compared to the control group
This shows that distinguishing between types of long term memory enables specific treatments to be developed
What is a strength for Tulving’s Stores of Long Term Memory?
Supporting Evidence
Evidence from the case studies of HM and Clive Wearing show the presence of separate stores
Episodic memory was severely damaged in both men due to brain damage but their other memory stores were relatively unaffected
This evidence supports Tulving’s view that there are different memory stores in the long term memory, as one store can be damaged but other stores are unaffected
What is a limitation for Tulving’s Stores of Long Term Memory?
Lack of Control
Studying people with brain injuries can help researchers to understand how memory is supposed to work normally, but brain injuries are usually unexpected
The researcher has no way of controlling what happened to the participant prior to or during the injury, but without this it is difficult to judge exactly how much worse it is afterwards
This lack of control limits what clinical studies can tell us about different types of long term memory
What is a limitation for Tulving’s Stores of Long Term Memory?
Conflicting Neuroimaging Evidence
Peterson et al (1996) reviewed evidence about the location of semantic and episodic memory and found that semantic memory is stored on the left prefrontal cortex and episodic memory is on the right
Other research claims that the left prefrontal cortex is for the encoding of episodic memories and the right prefrontal cortex is for retrieval of episodic memories
This challenges any neurophysiological evidence to support types of memory as there is poor agreement on the location of each type