Baddeley et al (1975) had participants carry out a visual and verbal task at the same time and found that when both tasks are the same, performance declines compared to when one task is visual and the other is verbal
This is because both visual tasks compete for the same subsystem, whereas there is no competition when performing a verbal and visual task together
This shows the existence of a separate subsystem that processes visual input and another that processes verbal processing
What was the finding from Shallice and Warrington's (1970) case study of KF?
KF had poor auditorymemory but normal visualmemory
Shallice and Warrington’s (1970) case study of KF shows that KF had poor short term memory after his brain injury for auditory information but could process visual information normally
This was because his phonological loop was damaged but his visuo-spatial sketchpad was still intact
This finding strongly supports the existence of separate visual and acoustic memory stores
What is a limitation for the Working Memory Model?
Nature of the Central Executive
The role of the central executive is unclear
Baddeley (2003) claimed that the central executive is the most important yet least understood component of working memory
This means the central executive challenges the integrity of the working memory model
What is a limitation for the Working Memory Model?
Lack of Control
It is unclear if KF had other cognitive impairments which may have affected his performance on memory tasks
For example, his injury was caused by a motorcycle accident and the trauma involved in his accident may have affected his cognitive performance
This challenges evidence that comes from clinical studies of people with brain injuries that may have affected many different systems