Retrieval Failure: Cue & State Dependent

Cards (28)

  • What is retrieval failure?
    Occurs without necessary cues to access memory
  • What is a cue in memory retrieval?
    A trigger of information to access memory
  • What did Tulving (1983) discover about retrieval failure?
    He discovered the encoding specificity principle
  • What is the encoding specificity principle?
    A cue must be present at coding and retrieval
  • What happens if cues at encoding and retrieval differ?
    There will be some forgetting
  • What is context-dependent forgetting?
    Recall depends on external cues
  • What is an external cue?
    Stimuli from the environment influencing thoughts
  • What is state-dependent forgetting?
    Recall depends on internal cues
  • What is an internal cue?
    Patterns of thinking that trigger memory
  • What did Godden and Baddeley (1975) study?
    Deep-sea divers' recall underwater vs land
  • What were the conditions in Godden and Baddeley's study?
    Divers learned words underwater or on land
  • What was the finding of Godden and Baddeley's study?
    Accurate recall was 40% lower in non-matching conditions
  • What conclusion did Godden and Baddeley reach?
    External cues at learning differed from recall
  • What did Carter and Cassaday (1998) research?
    State-dependent forgetting with antihistamine drugs
  • What were the conditions in Carter and Cassaday's study?
    Participants learned before or after taking drugs
  • What was the finding of Carter and Cassaday's study?
    Accurate recall was worse in non-matching conditions
  • What conclusion did Carter and Cassaday reach?
    More forgetting occurs when cues are absent
  • What are the real-world applications of retrieval failure research?
    • Cues can aid memory recall
    • Recall environment can enhance memory
    • Strategies can improve real-world recall
  • What research supports retrieval failure?
    • Godden & Baddeley (1975) study
    • Carter & Cassaday (1998) study
    • Evidence in real-world situations
  • What do Eysenck & Keane (2010) argue about retrieval failure?
    It is the main reason for long-term memory forgetting
  • What does Baddeley (1997) argue about context effects?
    Context effects are weak in everyday life
  • How do similar environments affect forgetting?
    They are unlikely to cause much forgetting
  • What did Godden & Baddeley (1980) find in their recognition test?
    No context-dependent effect was observed
  • What does the recognition test suggest about retrieval failure?
    It only applies to recall, not recognition
  • What is a strength for Retrieval Failure
    Real World Application
    • Baddeley suggests cues are worth paying attention to despite not having a strong effect on forgetting
    • When we have trouble remembering something, it is probably best to recall the environment in which you learned it
    • This shows how research can remind us of strategies we use in the real world to improve our recall
  • What is a strength for Retrieval Failure?
    Research Support
    • Studies by Godden & Baddeley (1975) and Carter & Cassaday (1988) show that a lack of relevant cues at recall can lead to context-dependent and state-dependent forgetting in everyday life
    • Eysenck & Keane (2010) argue that retrieval failure is perhaps the main reason for forgetting from the long term memory
    • This evidence shows that retrieval failure occurs in real-world situations as well as in controlled conditions
  • What is a limitation for Retrieval Failure?
    Context Effects
    • Baddeley (1997) argues that context effects are not very strong in especially in everyday life
    • Similar environments are unlikely to result in much forgetting, as compared to completely different environments
    • This means that retrieval failure due to lack of contextual cues may not actually explain much about everyday thinking
  • What is a limitation for Retrieval Failure?
    Recall vs Recognition
    • Godden & Baddeley (1980) replicated their underwater experiment but used a recognition test rather than a recall test
    • When recognition was tested, there was no context-dependent effect and so performance was the same across all 4 conditions
    • This suggests that retrieval failure is a limited explanation for forgetting because it only applies when a person has to recall information rather than recognise it