Baddeley suggests cues are worth paying attention to despite not having a strong effect on forgetting
When we have trouble remembering something, it is probably best to recall the environment in which you learned it
This shows how research can remind us of strategies we use in the real world to improve our recall
What is a strength for Retrieval Failure?
Research Support
Studies by Godden & Baddeley (1975) and Carter & Cassaday (1988) show that a lack of relevant cues at recall can lead to context-dependent and state-dependent forgetting in everyday life
Eysenck & Keane (2010) argue that retrieval failure is perhaps the main reason for forgetting from the long term memory
This evidence shows that retrieval failure occurs in real-world situations as well as in controlled conditions
What is a limitation for Retrieval Failure?
Context Effects
Baddeley (1997) argues that context effects are not very strong in especially in everyday life
Similar environments are unlikely to result in much forgetting, as compared to completely different environments
This means that retrieval failure due to lack of contextual cues may not actually explain much about everyday thinking
What is a limitation for Retrieval Failure?
Recall vs Recognition
Godden & Baddeley (1980) replicated their underwater experiment but used a recognition test rather than a recall test
When recognition was tested, there was no context-dependent effect and so performance was the same across all 4 conditions
This suggests that retrieval failure is a limited explanation for forgetting because it only applies when a person has to recall information rather than recognise it