What is a strength for Anxiety affecting Eyewitness Testimony?
Support for Negative Effects
Valentine & Mesout (2009) supports the research on weapon focus, finding negative effects on recall
The researchers used heart rate to divide participants into high-anxiety and low-anxiety groups and in this study, anxiety disrupted the participants’ ability to recall details about the actor in the London Dungeon’s Labyrinth
This suggests that a high level of anxiety does have a negative effect on the immediate eyewitness recall of a stressful event
What is a strength for Anxiety affecting Eyewitness Testimony?
Support for Positive Effects
Christianson & Hubinette (1993) interviewed 58 witnesses to actual bankrobberies in Sweden in which some of the witnesses were directly involved and some were indirectly involved
Recall was more than 75% accurate across all witnesses and the direct victims, who were the most anxious, were even more accurate
These findings from actual crimes confirm that anxiety does not reduce the accuracy of recall for eyewitnesses and may even enhance it
What is a limitation for Anxiety affecting Eyewitness Testimony?
Unusualness not Anxiety
The reason participants focused on the weapon may be because they were surprised at what they saw rather than being scared
Pickel (1998) conducted an experiment using scissors, a handgun, a wallet or a raw chicken as items in a hairdressing salon in which eyewitness accuracy was poorer in the high unusualness conditions
This suggests that the weapon focus effect is due to unusualness rather than anxiety and therefore tells us nothing specifically about the effects of anxiety on eyewitness testimony
What is a limitation for Anxiety affecting Eyewitness Testimony?
Confounding Variables
Christianson & Hubinette (1993) interviewed participants several months after the event and so the researchers therefore had no control over what happened to the participants during the intervening time
The effects of anxiety may have been overwhelmed by these other factors and impossible to assess by the time the participants were interviewed
Therefore it is possible that a lack of control over confounding variables may be responsible for these findings, invalidating their support