The filter model argues that relationships develop through 3 filters and different factors are important.
Kerckhoff and Davis referred to a “field of availables” where we could have a relationship with some possible people.
After the filters, potential partners are reduced with different reasons to a “field of desirables” where we consider potential partners.
What is the first filter?
Social demographic variables
This filter exerts influence without us being aware of it.
People mix with people who are similar to them in many ways such as going to college or work.
A much larger group who live in other places/backgrounds are rarely encountered.
This means that there is a small selection of people who are similar in education and economic background.
We find these people more attractive as we have more in common with them.
What is the second filter?
Similarity of attitudes
This filter happens once people start going out with each other.
This filter argues that similar thinking and beliefs can lead to better communication and better progress in a relationship.
If the people are different in their views or thinking however, the relationship may not progress due to difficult communication.
People with different attitudes, values and interests are filtered.
What is the third filter?
Complemenarity of needs
Once the couple has been established in the long term, this is when the third filter kicks in.
This is how people fit in together as a couple and whether they meet each other’s needs.
For example, one may like the need to be caring and the other person likes being cared for, which works as they complement each other.
This is attractive as it gives the couple forming a whole, which makes the relationship more successful.
Supporting study for the filter theory?
Kerckhoff and Davis (1962) tested their filter model by using a longitudinal study where they asked student couples either less or more than 18 months.
They used several questionnaires over a 7 month period asking the students about attitude similarity and personality traits.
They found that attitude similarly was the most important factor until 18 months and past that it was about the couple’s needs and psychological compatibility.
This supports the filter theory as it shows the second and third filters.
Negative evaluation for research findings replication?
However, these research findings have not been replicated.
In recent years, the use of online dating has increased.
This has massively changed the process of forming relationships, particularly social demographic variables.
It is easier to meet people and likely to meet someone outside of our demographic circle 30 years ago.
This suggests that the filter theory lacks temporal validity.
Negative evaluation regarding cause and effect?
Psychologists argue there is a cause and effect problem - bi-directional ambiguity.
The filter theory argues that similar attitudes create attraction , however Anderson (2003) found that cohabiting partners became more similar over time. This is called emotional convergence.
They argued that attitude similarity is not a cause but rather an effect of attraction.
This goes against the filter theory.
Negative evaluation regarding biased?
Filter theory can be criticised for being beta gender biased as it ignores the fact that men and women may use different filters.
Buss’ study of 37 cultures found that men filter through physical attributes and women will look for more resource and wealth based.
Filter theory is also culturally biased as it focuses only on western relationship formation and may not generalise to other cultures.
Collectivist cultures have arranged marriages so it may not generalise. So it ignores cross-cultural differences.