Tajfel and Turner (1979) suggest that prejudice comes from the formation of two groups wihtout any other factors being present
social identity
an individuals self concept and comes from mhow they see themselves in relation to membership of their social groups
belonging to a group creates in-group self categorisation, leads to in-group favouritism and hostility towards the out-group
to enhance self esteem people perceive their in groups as better
social categorisation
seeing oneself as part of a group
social identification
the process of moving from categorising oneself as part of the in-group to identifying with the group more overly
what happens during self identification
an individual is likely to take on the norms and attitudes of group members
social comparison
occurs when one compares themself with the out-group because the individuals selfconcept becomes wrapped up in the in-group, people see their in-group as better than the out-group
what 3 variables contribute to in-group favouritism?
the extent to which the individuals identify with the group, the extent to which there are grounds for making comparisons with the out-group, the relevance of the comparisons group to the in-group
research to support social identity theory
Tajfel found that minimal groups of boys awarded their own group points instead of sharing, supports in-group favouritism
issue with Tajfel
lacks validity as the sample was only made out of 14/15 year old boys from Bristol, low population validity, limits its use to support the theory,
research to criticise
Wetherall found that Polynesian children were more generous to out-groups in comparison to white children,