what is inter-rater reliability in the context of SZ?
occurs when different clinicians make identicalindependent diagnoses of same patient (different people/clinicans)
what is test-retest reliability in context of SZ?
occurs when tests used to deliver these diagnoses are consistent over time (same person/clinician over time)
what is validity in the context of SZ?
extent to which a diagnosis represents something that is real and distinct from other disorders (are we testing what we want to test, and is it distinct) and the extent that a classification system such as ICD or DSM measures what it claims to measure
what is descriptive validity in the context of SZ?
to be valid, patients with SZ should differ in symptoms from patients with other disorders
what is predictive validity in the context of SZ?
if diagnosis leads to successfultreatment, then diagnosis is seen as valid
what is aetiological validity in context of SZ?
to be valid, all SZ should have the same cause for the disorder, but it doesn't, so it might be claimed that because a treatmentworks, then you can tell something about the disorder in the first place, which isn't necessarilytrue (treatment-aetiology fallacy)
how are reliability and validity inextricably linked?
if a scientist can'tagree who has SZ (low reliability) then questions of what it actually is (validity) becomes essentially meaningless, and vice versa
what is co-morbidity?
when two (or more) medical conditions occur at the same time
makes it harder to diagnose and classify SZ accurately
becomes more difficult to establish reliability and validity
a person with SZ may also be suffering from anotherdisorder like depression, alcoholism etc
what is symptom overlap?
considerableoverlap of symptoms because of co-morbidity e.g. bipolar disorder, PTSD etc
could lead to unreliable or incorrect diagnosis (not valid)