Save
Forensics
Eysencks theory
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Eva GIlbert
Visit profile
Cards (14)
Eysenck proposed that behaviour could be represented along three dimensions:
Introversion-extraversion
Neuroticism-stability
Psychoticism-sociability
According to
Eysenck
our personality traits are
biological
in origin and come through the type of
nervous system
we inherit
The criminal personality
:
an individual who scores highly on measures of
extraversion
,
neuroticism
and
psychoticism
Cannot be easily contained, cold and unfeeling and likely to engage in offending behaviour
Extraverts
have an underactive nervous system
meaning they constantly seek excitement, stimulation and engage in risk-taking behaviours
tend to not be conditioned easily so do not learn from mistakes
Neurotic
High levels of reactivity in the
sympathetic nervous system
they respond quickly to situations of
threat
Tend to be nervous jumpy and overanxious
Instability
makes them hard to predict
Psychotic
individuals are suggested to have higher levels of
testosterone
unemotional
and prone to aggression
Criminal personality type
is
neurotic-extravert-psychotic
Neurotics
are unstable so overreact in threatening situations
Extraverts
seek more arousal and thus engage in dangerous activities
Psychotics
are aggressive and lack empathy
The role of socialisation
offending behaviour
is linked through socialisation processes
Eysenck
saw offending as
developmentally immature
, in that it is selfish and demands
immediate gratification
-
offenders
are impatient
Process of socialisation is one in which children are taught to become more able to delay gratification and become
socially orientated
Eysenck believed people with high E and
N scores
were difficult to
condition
So were less likely to have learnt this, so are more likely to act
antisocially
when the opportunity presents itself
Measuring the criminal personality
'Eysenck
personality questionnaire'
EPQ
A psychological test that locates respondents along the E,N and P
dimensions
to determine their personality type
This measurement was important to Eysencks theory because it enabled him to compare it to levels of
criminality
A03: Research support
Eysenck
compared
2070
prisoners
scores of the
EPQ
with
2422
controls
On measures of
Neuroticism
,
extraversion
and
psychoticism
, across all age ranges, prisoners scored higher than the control
this agrees with the predictions made by the theory that offenders rate higher across all 3 dimensions
CC
:
Farrington
conducted a meta-analysis and reported offenders scored highly on
psychoticism
and not so much
extraversion
and
neuroticism
There is also inconsistent evidence for
EEG
measures which are used to measure cortical arousal between
extraverts
and
introverts
Casts doubt on the
physiological
basis of
Eysencks
theory
A03
: Too simplistic
Offending behaviour cannot be explained by personality alone
Moffitt
drew a distinction between offending behaviour that occurs in
adolescence
and that which carries on into
adult
hood
She argued personality traits alone were a poor predictor of how long offending behaviour would go on for
Considered the effects of the
environment
in the persistence of offending behaviour
Paints a more complex picture than
Eysenck
suggested
A03:
culture-bound
Criminal personality may vary according to culture
Bartol and Holanchock studied
Hispanic
and
African-American
offenders in a
maximum security prison
in New York
Researchers divided offenders into
6 groups
based on offending history
Found all 6 groups were less extraverted then control groups of
non-offenders
Questions the generalisability of
Eysencks theory
A03
: Measuring personality
Personality
type may be too complex to simply reduce to a score
Also too dynamic to quantify