retrieval failure

Cards (17)

  • What does research support indicate about retrieval failure?
    Memory is best when cues are available.
  • What did Godden, Baddeley, and Carrier-Cassaday find in their studies?
    Cues available at learning improve recall.
  • What did Goodwin investigate regarding state-dependent forgetting?
    Effects of intoxication on memory recall.
  • How does internal cue matching affect recall according to Goodwin's findings?
    Recall is best when internal cues match.
  • What conclusion can be drawn about retrieval failure from the evidence presented?
    A lack of appropriate cues causes forgetting.
  • What does Baddeley argue about context effects?
    Context effects are not very strong.
  • What is unlikely to cause forgetting according to Baddeley's argument?
    Learning in one room, recalling in another.
  • What limitation does retrieval failure have in explaining forgetting?
    It can only explain some forgetting instances.
  • What contradictory evidence exists regarding retrieval failure?
    It only explains forgetting during recall, not recognition.
  • What did Godden & Baddeley find when using a recognition test?
    Context did not affect recognition performance.
  • How does context change affect recall and recognition according to Godden & Baddeley?
    Context change affects recall, not recognition.
  • What does the evidence suggest about retrieval failure as an explanation of forgetting?
    It is a limited explanation of forgetting.
  • What does the theory of retrieval failure rely on according to the text?
    Poor quality evidence.
  • Why can't the findings from Godden & Baddeley be generalized?
    The study is too specific to divers.
  • What is a limitation of the lab studies mentioned in the text?
    They lack ecological validity.
  • What does the lack of mundane realism in the studies imply?
    Findings can't be applied to everyday memory tasks.
  • What does the text conclude about retrieval failure as an explanation of forgetting?
    It relies on poor evidence and is limited.