How does specialisation operate at the micro (firm-level) and macro (country-level) scale?
At the firm-level, specialisation involves division of labor and investment in specialized capital. At the country-level, specialisation leads to increased productivity and international competitiveness.
How does specialisation within a firm lead to increased productivity?
Firms divide labor and capital, allowing workers to become highly skilled in specific tasks, reducing training time and increasing output per worker. Firms can also invest in capital tailored to specialised production, leading to economies of scale.
What are the impacts of lower costs and higher productivity from specialisation on firms and consumers?
Lower costs and higher productivity make firms more competitive in domestic and international markets, allowing them to earn higher profits. Consumers benefit from lower prices and greater choice.
What are the potential drawbacks of over-specialisation for workers?
Over-specialisation can lead to monotonous and repetitive tasks, reducing worker motivation and job satisfaction. If skills become too narrow, workers may struggle to adapt when industries evolve.
What are the potential consequences of over-specialisation for firms?
Over-specialisation can result in higher absenteeism and turnover rates, reducing productivity in the long run. Firms may also suffer from increased training and replacement costs.
How does specialisation at the national level lead to productivity growth?
Specialisation allows firms to focus on areas where they are most efficient, leading to higher aggregate productivity. Investment in capital and technology also enhances labour productivity, contributing to long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) growth.
How does the diagram illustrate the productivity-driven growth from specialisation at the national level?
The diagram shows a shift in the Long-Run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) curve, illustrating how increased productivity from specialisation leads to economic growth and a rise in real GDP.
What are the potential benefits of productivity growth from specialisation for the government and the economy?
Sustainable economic growth improves living standards and reduces unemployment. The government also has more fiscal flexibility to reduce budget deficits or invest in infrastructure.
How can specialisation lead to regional disparities and structural unemployment?
Specialisation may lead to uneven economic development, with some areas growing rapidly while others stagnate. Workers in declining industries may struggle to transition into specialised sectors, leading to structural unemployment.
What are the potential consequences of regional disparities and structural unemployment from specialisation?
Negative multiplier effects can emerge in struggling regions, reducing overall economic performance. The government may need to intervene with regional investment policies to prevent long-term stagnation.