Save
✅
Paper 2
Part A - research methods
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Sophie Kennedy
Visit profile
Cards (45)
Reliability
ability to trust data
primary data
personal research
anecdotal
positivism
quantitative
data
removes
bias
'puppets
of
society'
ignores
emotion
patters and trends
positivist perspective
free will, choice, and individualism
less
influential
than societies ability to shape human behaviour
secondary data
second-hand research
eg
. books and documentaries
objectivity
value-free
objective
neutrality
sampling
used
scientific truths
value freedom
objectivity
subjectivity
opinions
potential
bias
reflexivity
considers
bias
reflection on
results
holds themselves
accountable
interpretivism
qualitative
data
builds
relationships
with
subjects,
increases
accuracy
of
results
'people
aren't
numbers'
considers
bias
generalisability
applying results to a broader context
quantitative data
numbers
facts
science
used,
prestigious
qualitative data
opinions
no
science
used
questions
asked,
eg. interviews
context
considered
validity
data
is factual
representativeness
sample group
is small, have
similar
backgrounds to apply to a wider group
Verstehen
-
Weber
(interpretivism)
observing
the
world
from
the
viewpoint
of
individuals
in
society,
causing
empathy
and
sympathy
anti-positivist
people act with conscious intention
rejected
objectification
of
humans
people
are
responsible
for
their
own
destinies,
we are
conscious
beings
and
act
with
intention
and
purpose
'people
are
architects
of
society'
Pilot studies
small scale
study in preparation of a larger study
Ethnography
interpretivism
qualitative data
context used
a
study over time
little
disturbance
of subject group
Random sampling
subjects
chosen randomly
pros
- varied results, no bias
cons
- no patterns
Systematic Sampling
subjects
chosen at regular intervals
pros - little bias
cons - risk of
data manipulation
Volunteer Sampling
participants
self-select
pros -
cheap
cons -
bias
Snowball Sampling
participants
recruit others
pros
- easy
cons
- bias
Research methods
surveys
-
open
and/or
closed
questions, inclusive,
online
/
face-to-face
triangulation
- reliable, detailed
group interviews
Social facts
norms
and values
others' influence
we act on what others do,
oppression
conformity
Mead
- the
'social self'
identity emerges from social interactions
learn norms and values by
socialisation
'we are socially
produced'
Sociological Ethics
subjects must be aware
participant consent
needed
no engagement in
deception
or crime
Opportunity sampling
participants
selected by availability
pros - quick, easy, convenient
cons -
sample bias
Hypothesis
a
theory
Types of data collection
unstructured interviews
structured interviews
group interviews
questionnaires
surveys
semi-structured interviews
multi-choice
open questions
closed questions
reflexivity
self-evaluate
research
representativeness
small group
represents larger group
generalisability
results
applied
to a
wider
context
ethical considerations
consent
no knowledge of illegal activity
right to
withdraw
snowball sampling
subjects
recruit more subjects
cons, potential
sampling bias
by subjects
volunteer sampling
self-selected
/volunteers as subjects
opportunity sampling
random subjects chosen my proximity (convenience sampling)
cons, could lack representativeness
systematic sampling
used
probability
random sampling
electoral register
could be used
stratified sampling
divides
population
into small sample groups
quota sampling
target certain subjects
cons,
potential researcher bias
See all 45 cards