the fear of being in situations that escape would be difficult
Specific phobia
the fear of a specificobject or animal
Two process model suggests
Phobias are acquired through classical conditioning
Maintained through operant conditioning
Phobias through classical conditioning
A person develops a phobia of a neutral stimulus if they encounter that neutral stimulus with an unpleasantunconditionedstimulus
Association is formed between the two
Neutralstimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus and a person develops a conditionedresponse to that stimulus.
Phobias through operant conditioning
When a person avoids a fearedstimulus the negativefeeling is removed
Behaviour is reinforced through negative reinforcement
Little albert study: Watson and Rayner
Conducted study of Little Albert in 1920 providing evidence for the first step of the two process model
Repeatedly presented littleAlbert with a whiterat and would pair the appearance of the rat with a loudnoise
The rat was at first a neutralstimulus as littleAlbert at first showed no response to the rat
However littlealbert began to associate the neutralstimulus with the unconditionedstimulus which was the loudnoise
The rat became the conditionedstimulus and littleAlbertcrying became the conditionedresponse
Barlow and Durand's study
they found out 50% of participants could recall a traumaticevent that caused their drivingphobia and out of the people who could recall the event, many have not driven since
Supports idea that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning through the association of a fearedstimulus with a traumatic event.
Supports that behaviour is maintained through operant conditioning as avoidance of the fearedstimulus is negativelyreinforced
Limitations to the behaviourist explanation of phobias
Not all phobias are caused by a traumatic event
Phobias could be geneticallydetermined
Flooding
exposing patients to their worstfear and encouraging them to remain with it until the anxietywearsoff
Systematic desensitisation
A treatment which involves:
A fear hierarchy
Relaxation techniques e.g. deep breathing
Exposure to the feared stimulus
Support for flooding: Kaplan and Tolin
Found that 65% of patients had no symptoms of a specific phobia4 years after a session of flooding showing effectiveness for treating specific phobias as it removed symptoms in patients for a long time after treatment.
Support for systematic desensitisation: Ost
Found out that 90% of patients treated with systematicdesensitisation were much improved or completely recovered from their phobia
Strengths of systematic desensitisation
exposes patient to the fearedstimuli gradually creating less distress
More ethical than flooding
Limitations of systematic desensitisation
Less effective at treating social phobias and agoraphobias
Limitations of flooding
Can strengthen the association between the conditioned and unconditionedstimulus causing the patient to produce an even greater conditioned feared response.
Unethical and can cause distress
Not appropriate for some patients such as children
Strengths of flooding
Quick and effective for reducing anxieties
Can lead to permanentelimination of phobias
Allows clients to confront fears in a controlledenvironment