Fromm-Reichmann (1948) proposed explanation based on accounts from patients about childhoods.
noted many spoke of a particular type of parent (schizophrenogenic mother)
believed them to be cold, rejecting and controlling and tends to create a family climate of tension and secrecy. leading to paranoid delusions and SZ
Family Dysfunction- Double-bind theory:
Bateson (1972) emphasised role of communication style within a family
developing child finds themselves trapped in situations where fear doing the wrong thing but mixed messages about what it is.
when they 'get it wrong' child is punished by withdrawal of love leaving them understanding the world as confusing and dangerous causing symptoms like delusions and disorganised thinking- risk factor
Family Dysfunction- Expressed Emotion:
EE is level of emotion (negative) expressed towards a person with SZ by carers.
EE contains several elements: verbal criticism, hostitlity and emotional overinvolvement
this is a serious source of stress for them- primarily an explanation for relapse in those with SZ
Family Dysfunction- Evaluation strength: research support
indicators of family dysfunction include insecure attachement and exposure to trauma.
Review by Read (2005) found adults with SZ most likely to have insecure attachment and 69% women and 59% men have a history of physical/sexual abuse.
Morkved (2017) study found most adults with SZ have at least one childhood trauma
Family Dysfunction- Evaluating limitation: Explanations lack support
no evidence to support the importance of traditional family-based theories like the schizophrenogenic mother and double bind.
both these theories are based on clinical observation of people with SZ and informal assessments of their mother's personalities
meaning family explanations cannot account for the link between childhood trauma and SZ
Cognitive explanations- Dysfunctional thinking
SZ associated with many types of dysfunctional thought processing ( may provide explanations for SZ)
SZ characterised by disruption to normal thought processing
reduced thought processing in ventral striatum associated with negative symptoms and reduced processing of information in temporal associated with hallucinations
Frith (1992) identified two types of dysfunctional thought processes, first is metarepresentation (cognitive ability to reflect on thoughts and behaviour allowing insight into our own intentions and goals)
dysfunction in metarepresentation would disrupt our ability to recognise our own thoughts and actions as being explained by ourselves rather than someone else, would explain hallucinations and hearing voices
Cognitive Explanations- Central control dysfunction
second type of dysfunctional thought process identified by Frith
central control dysfunction- cognitive ability to suppress automatic responses while we perform deliberate actions
speech poverty could result from the inability to suppress automatic thoughts and speech triggered by other thoughts
Cognitive Explanation- Evaluation strength: Research Support
Stirling (2006) compared performance on a range of cognitive tasks in 30 people with SZ and a control group of 30.
tasks included participants having to name the front colours of words and suppress tendency to read aloud
As predicted by Firth people with SZ took twice as longer on average- cognitive process impaired
Cognitive Explanation- Evaluation Limitation: A Proximal Explanation
Cognitive explanations for SZ are proximal because they explain what is happening now to produce symptoms. distal explanations focus on what initially caused the symptom.
currently unclear how genetic variation or childhood trauma might lead to problems with metarepresentation and central control- partial explanation