Glowacki et al (2016) identified 7 high quality studies published between 1999 and 2013 that examined the effectiveness of token economies for people with chronic mental health issue
All studies showed a reduction in negative symptoms and a decline in the frequency of unwanted behaviours
This supports the value of token economies
What is a limitation for Token Economies?
File Drawer Problem
However, 7studies is still a small evidence base to support the effectiveness of a technique
One issue with a small number of studies is the file drawer problem, where it leads to bias towards positive published findings because undesirable results have been ‘filed away’, which is a problem in reviews that only include a small number of studies
This means that there is a serious question over the evidence for the effectiveness of token economies
What is a limitation for Token Economies?
Ethical Issues
The use of token economies raises ethical issues because it gives professionals considerable power to control the behaviour of people in the role of the patient
This inevitably involves imposing one institution’s norms on to others, which is especially problematic if target behaviours are not identified sensitively, and legal action by families who see their relative in position has been a major factor in the decline in the use of token economies
This means that the benefit of token economies may be outweighed by their impact on personal freedom and short-term reduction in quality of life
What is a limitation for Token Economies?
Alternative Approaches
Even if token economies can be helpful for managingschizophrenia, there are other approaches with a comparable evidence base that do not raise the same ethical issues
Chiang et al (2019) concluded that art therapy may be a good alternative, as it is a pleasant experience without major risks of side effects or ethical abuses; NICE guidelines also recommend art therapy for schizophrenia
This means that art therapy might be a good alternative to token economies