Helsinki Accords

Cards (19)

  • 1a. August 1975
  • 2a. Basket 1: European Borders – borders are inviolable and cannot be altered by force.
  • 3a. Basket 2: International Cooperation – work for closer relations between East and West which would include trade agreements; technology exchange and joint space mission.
  • 4a. Basket 3: Human Rights – we will respect human rights and individual freedoms such as free speech; religion; free movement across Europe.
  • 1b. First time the boundaries between East and West Germany were formally accepted
  • 2b. Soviet-American Apollo-Soyuz mission of 1975.
  • 3b. USA politicians were critical of the concept of accepting Soviet expansion in Europe.
  • 4b. The USSR had little intention of genuinely offering human rights, so this section had little impact.
  • What is the date associated with the agreements discussed?
    August 1975
  • What are the three baskets of agreements made in August 1975?
    1. European Borders
    • Borders are inviolable and cannot be altered by force.
    1. International Cooperation
    • Closer relations between East and West, including trade agreements, technology exchange, and joint space missions.
    1. Human Rights
    • Respect for human rights and individual freedoms such as free speech, religion, and free movement across Europe.
  • What does Basket 1 state about European borders?
    Borders are inviolable and cannot be altered by force
  • What is the focus of Basket 2 regarding international relations?
    Closer relations between East and West
  • What activities are included in Basket 2 for international cooperation?
    Trade agreements, technology exchange, joint space mission
  • What does Basket 3 emphasize regarding human rights?
    Respect for human rights and individual freedoms
  • What was a significant consequence of the agreements regarding Germany?
    Boundaries between East and West Germany were accepted
  • What was the name of the Soviet-American mission in 1975?
    Apollo-Soyuz mission
  • How did USA politicians react to the concept of accepting Soviet expansion in Europe?
    They were critical of the concept
  • What was the USSR's intention regarding human rights according to the document?
    They had little intention of genuinely offering human rights
  • What was the overall impact of the human rights section in the agreements?
    It had little impact due to USSR's intentions