asking a class to write 10 words linking to a robbery (represents our schema)
what happens when we come across new knowledges / experiences?
the relevant schema is activated
what do we assume about a situation using schema?
that the situation matches the knowledge contained in our schema - allows us to process info about the world efficiently, by making guesses on what the situation is probably like
(e.g. telling someone you went to a gig so they make several assumptions on what happened
more info on schemas
the way knowledge is organised in our brain
stereotype is a sub group
pre existing ideas of things
corrections adapt our schema
tend to remember things based on our schema and not memory
what influences our schema?
culture
tulving (1972) - LTM
believed there is 2 types of LTM
declarative - semantic & episodic (you can say it, consciously recalled, describing past event)
squire (1980) - LTM
non declarative - procedural (you can’t say it, unconscious)
episodic memory
auto biographical memory
recalling personal knowledge not shared
time stamped to specific moments
contextual- sensory details & emotions
auto biographical-personal to individual
brain areas involved in episodic memory
hippocampus - essential for forming & consolidating episodic memories
semantic memory
general knowledge & facts
shared knowledge
abstract- not tied to personal experiences
timeless- unrelated to specific events
brain areas involved in semantic memory
temporal & frontal lobes
case study evidence for LTM
clive wearing & kent cochrane show that episodic & semantic memory are 2 different stores
strengths of tulving’s model
neuroimaging progides biological support for the distinction between the 2 memory stores
case study evidence
can use this in reallife ( alzhimer’s disease, etc.) - generalisable
weaknesses of tulving’s model
doesn’t focus on procedural memory
overlap of episodic & semantic memory
strength of baddeley’s study
high internal validity
used well controlled procedures
e.g. groups 1,2,3,4 were matched with each other in terms of how frequently the words appear in english - this means the results couldn’t be explained by participants trying to remember more familiar words (this avoids potential confounding variables)
limitation of baddeley’s study
low external validity
they were so tightly controlled that it was artificial and not like reallife
e.g. in real life, STM and LTM probably do interact but baddeley saw this as a confounding variables that needed to be eliminated
only when he increased control over the procedure that semantic coding in LTM became obvious
who proposed reconstructive memory
bartlett (1932)
key features of reconstructive memory
schemas
memory distortion
confabulation
rationalisation
schemas in reconstructive memory
mentalframeworks that help organise and interpret information
they influence how we encode, store and retrieve memories