What are the limitations of the multi-store model?
Notion of unitary stores is toosimplistic
Modelsolelyemphasisesshallow processing
Strength = scientific research support
There is considerableresearchevidence for the existence of separate memory stores which are mostlycontrolledlab studies
E.g. Baddeley (1966) showscoding is semantic for LTM and acoustic for STM
This supports the MSM’sview that these twomemorystores are separate and independent
HOWEVER - many of the researchstudiesmakeuse of artificial materials
Strength = case study support
Psychologists have usedcasestudies of individuals with brain damage and amnesia to showdifferentareas of the brain are involved in STM and LTM
E.g. casestudy of patient HM whose LTM was damaged after surgery but his STM was stillintact
HOWEVER - casestudies are based on onlyoneindividual so generalisation is difficult
Limitation = idea of unitary stores is too simplistic
The MSM suggests that STM and LTM are single ‘unitary’ stores but research doesn’tsupport this
It has been found that STM is different in the kinds of memoriesstoredthere
E.g. Shallice and Warrington (1970) studiedpatientKF (who had amnesia)
KF’s STM for digits was verypoor when readaloud to him but better when he was able to read the digits to himself
Suggests there is oneSTMstore to processvisualinformation and another for auditoryinformation
The WMMincludesthese
Limitation = model solely emphasises shallow processing
According to the MSM what matters in rehearsal is the amount of time
Craik and Tulving (1975) determined what reallymatters is the type of processing done when rehearsing, things that are processedmoredeeply are morememorable
Participantsgiven a list of nouns and asked a questioninvolvingshallow or deep processing
Participantsrememberedmorewords in the taskinvolvingdeepprocessing, known as elaborative rehearsal
This type of rehearsal is needed for LTM storage, MSMdoesn‘ttake this into account