ao1: social constructionist - GD explained in terms of socialisation
Gender identity 'invented' by societies, not biological. Gende confusion (dysphoria) arises because people have to select gender.
Therefore dysphoria is not pathological (a mental disorder) but due to social factors.
For example, McClintock (2015) studied biological males in New Guinea born with female genitals due to genetic condition. At puberty genitals change and accepted as kwolu-aatmwol - females-then-males.
However, after contact with West kwolu-aatmwol are seen as abnormal instead of normal.
ao1: psychoanalytic theory
Ovesey and Person (1973) suggest GD in biological males is caused by a child experiencing extreme separation anxiety before gender identity has been established.
The boy fantasises about a symbiotic fusion with his mother to relieve his anxiety and remove his fear of separation.
As a result the boy 'becomes' the mother and thus adopts a female gender identity.
Stoller (1973) found that GD in biological males did describe overly close mother-son relationships that would lead to greater female identification and confused gender identity in the long term.
ao3: One strength is evidence of more than two gender roles.
Some cultures recognise more than two genders, e.g. fa'afafine of Samoa, challenging male versus female.
Increasing numbers of people now describe themselves as non- binary, showing cultural changes now match the lived experience of many.
This suggests that gender identity (and dysphoria) is best seen as a social construction than a biological fact.
ao3: One limitation is issues with psychoanalytic theory.
Ovesey and Person's theory does not explain GD in biological females and only applies to transgender females.
Rekers (1986) found that GD in transgender females is due to the absence of the father rather than fear of separation from the mother.
This suggests that psychoanalytic theory does not provide a comprehensive account of gender dysphoria.