weakness of the statistical infrequency definition is that it fails to consider the impact a behaviour has on an individual's ability to function in everyday life.
Evidence: For example, someone with a very high IQ, while statistically infrequent, may not experience any impairment in their daily functioning. In contrast, someone with a common behaviour like mild anxiety may struggle to perform in work or social settings, yet anxiety might not be considered statistically rare.
Explanation: The statistical infrequency definition focuses purely on how rare a behaviour is, rather than considering whether it disrupts an individual's ability to function in their personal or social life. Anxiety, despite being more common, can cause significant distress and impair an individual's functioning, making it more appropriate to label as abnormal even if it isn’t statistically rare.