Christian existentialist, responding to human search for meaning in context of post-war years.
Tillich - theology of correlation
wanted to show there was a correlation between questions raised by philosophy, the arts, the range of world religions, psychology & history & answers provided by theology.
all 'big questions' raised essentially come down to same question.
Therefore, for Tillich, theology not only has a place in, but should be central to, modern life & culture.
Tillich believed all religious language is symbolic rather than literal & cannot be subjected to tests in order to assess its meaningfulness.
Symbols
takes us beyond the world available to senses into the 'internal reality'.
symbol unlocks dimentions & elements of our soul
language used is intelligible & accessible to us but points beyond itself towards an ultimate reality, which is God.
defined symbols very broadly - including visual images, rituals, saints, stories.
Symbol 'participates' in the object represented
Eg. national flag - evokes feelings of loyalty & patriotism at the same time as it symbolises the country.
Eg use the symbol of God the Creator to help us come to terms with our place in the universe, our ambivalent relationship with natural world & our understanding of our purpose to be here.
Symbol of Christ - unlocks some mystery of the relation between the physical & the spiritual, our tendency to sin & our desire for freedom in a deterministic world
Tillich influenced by Aquinas
asserted that ordinary human language is inadequate to convey ultimate truth.
to use literal language of God is unhelpful & conveys a false impression on the nature of God.
Tillich & Being-Itself
criticises traditional ways of describing God - categorises God as a being = begs the question, who created God & put him into being.
Tillich understood God as Being-Itself (ground of all being)
God does not just exist; he is existence itself, the ground of all existence.
God is the very existence & not some thing that may or may not have existed.
Tillich's symbolic language is useful
preserves mystery of God - avoids anthropomorphism while communicating something deeper than words themselves. Symbolic language enables us to participate in deeper realitty.
allows us to say something, unlike apophatic way.
Symbolic lang changes over time = advantage because it can remain relevant to culture & time.
Tillich - considers religious language as cognitive - it expresses smthng about true reality.
Tillich's symbolic language isn't useful
Hick - what is meant by 'participates in'
Open to interpretation = loses meaning over time.
Too subjective & non-cognitive to be of any use except to person or community in which it is used. - limitation of God-talk
Randall
suggest that symbols are non-cognitive & have no objective reality; music or art touches emotions that cannot be reached in other ways.
Religion performs a valuable cultural function but it is simply a human endeavour.