Save
...
psych paper 3
cognition & development
baillargeon
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
grace sawtell
Visit profile
Cards (10)
๐ key assumptions
innate
, early-developing
physical reasoning
systems
failure in
piaget
due to
performance
limitations
developing
non-verbal
and
non-motoric
methods
๐ธ core knowledge theory
humans are born with
innate
systems for
understanding
the world
physical reasoning
system
infants have
expectations
about how objects
behave
๐ธ core principles of physical understanding
object
persistence
continuity
&
solidity
support
containment
occlusion
present from a young age and refined over time
๐ rationale behind violation of expectation
infants look
longer
at events that
violate
their
expectation
insight into what infants
understand
about the world before they
act
on it
๐ key study - drawbridge study
baillargeon et al
3.5
month old infants shown a
drawbridge
rotating through a
180ยฐ
arc
possible event - bridge
stops
when it hits the hidden box
impossible event - bridge
continues
to rotate, passing through the box
infants look longer at the
impossible
event
๐ key study - container study
baillargeon & graber
infants shown an object placed into a tall
container
possible - object is
visible
impossible - object
disappears
infants looker longer at the
impossible
event
๐ฏ implications of baillargeon's work
infants possess sophisticated
cognitive
abilities
earlier
than piaget suggests
nativist
view of development
importance of
age-appropriate
and
sensitive
research methods
โ strength of baillargeon - accurate
provides more valid and sensitive measure
measured looking
time
which doesn't rely on
motor
ability
removes
confounding
variables like motor
immaturity
challenge
underestimation
made by piaget
โ strength for baillargeon - support
support for innate cognitive structures
baillargeon
- showed
object permanence
and
solidity
are present
supports
core knowledge
theory that humans have
innate physical reasoning
systems
biological
foundation
โ limitation of baillargeon - interpretation
longer looking times doesn't indicate cognitive understanding
infants look longer at
novel
or
visually
stimulating events
VoE studies risk
over-interpreting
infant behaviour
validity
of inferences is questioned