Save
...
psych paper 3
forensic psychology
psychological explanations for offending
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
grace sawtell
Visit profile
Cards (30)
main assumption of eysenck's criminal personality theory
people with certain personality
traits
are
more
prone to offending behaviour
define extraversion
outgoing
,
impulsive
and seek immediate
gratification
define neuroticism
people who are easily
anxious
or
aroused
which leads to emotional
instability
define psychoticism
tendency toward
aggression
,
cruelty
and
antisocial
behaviour
explain eysenck's theory of criminal personality
criminals score high on
extraversion
,
neuroticism
and
psychoticism
individuals have a
lower
level of
conditioning
and less
responsive
to punishment
less likely to learn
socially acceptable
behaviours
what do cognitive explanations focus on?
individual's
thought
patterns and
mental
processes
what are the 2 cognitive explanations?
kohlberg's
level of
moral reasoning
cognitive
distortions
outline kohlberg's level of moral reasoning
offenders operate at
pre-conventional
morality rather than
higher
stages of moral reasoning
define pre-conventional level
individuals justify their crimes by focusing on the
benefit
to themselves or avoiding
punishment
define post-conventional level
actions are based on
universal ethical
principles
outline cognitive distortions
hostile attribution
bias - interpret
ambiguous
situations as
aggressive
or
threatening
minimisation
- downplay
seriousness
of crimes and
rationalise
behaviour to reduce feelings of
guilt
or
shame
who proposed the differential association theory?
sutherland
main assumption of the differential association theory
criminals are exposed to
pro-criminal
attitudes and values
key concepts of the differential association theory
frequency
-
more
exposure to criminal attitudes,
more
likely to engage in criminality
duration
-
longer
exposure,
more
likely it will be adopted
priority
-
early
associations are more influential
intensity
-
greater
importance of source, the
stronger
the impact
what is the psychodynamic explanation based on?
freud
main assumption of the psychodynamic explanation
unconscious
conflicts and early
childhood
shapes criminal behaviour
key concepts of the psychodynamic explanation
id
-
unconscious
part of personality, responsible for
desires
and
impulses
ego
-
rational
part that
mediates
between the
id
and
reality
superego
-
moral
conscience, developed through
socialisation
explain the role of the id, ego and superego in criminal behaviour
dysfunctional
superego fails to regulate the id's
impulses
which leads to criminal behaviour
strength of eysenck's theory - evidence
empirical
support
eysenck
&
eysenck
- criminals score higher on
E
,
N
and
P
compared to non-criminals
personality traits are linked to offending behaviour
weakness of eysenck's theory - incomplete
oversimplification
ignores
social
,
economic
and
environmental
influences
biological
determinism
weakness of eysenck's theory - validity
methodological
issues
use of
self-report
methods and
correlational
data
social desirability
bias
strength of cognitive distortions - relevance
practical
application to treatment
loza
&
loza-fanous
- offenders receiving
CBT
showed improvements in
self-control
and
reduced
criminal thinking
helps prevent
reoffending
weakness of cognitive distortions - causality
reliant
on thought patterns
ignores
socioeconomic
status,
trauma
and
peer
influence
limited
causality
weakness of cognitive distortions - effectiveness
cultural
bias
hostile attribution bias and minimisation are based on
western
models of psychological development
limits
generalisability
strength of differential association theory - evidence
empirical
support
shaw
&
mckay
- crime is
higher
in areas with high levels of
social disorganisation
criminal behaviour is learned through
interactions
and
associations
weakness of the differential association theory - simplistic
overemphasised
social learning
underestimates
individual
differences e.g.
genetics
or
personality
doesn't account for
complexity
weakness of the differential association theory - limited
doesn't account for
cultural
and
situational
variations
some cultures have types of crime that are
acceptable
whilst in others they are
discouraged
less
applicable
strength of the psychodynamic explanation - insight
valuable
insight into early
childhood
criminal behaviour results from unresolved
conflicts
between
id
,
ego
and
superego
that developed during childhood
deep
understanding
of impact
weakness of the psychodynamic explanation - evidence
lack of
empirical
support
based on subjective
case studies
which lack
scientific
evidence
difficulty with
falsifiability
weakness of the psychodynamic explanation - incomplete
overemphasis on
internal conflicts
neglects important
social
and
environmental
factors
fails to be
comprehensive