psychological explanations for offending

Cards (30)

  • main assumption of eysenck's criminal personality theory
    people with certain personality traits are more prone to offending behaviour
  • define extraversion
    outgoing, impulsive and seek immediate gratification
  • define neuroticism
    people who are easily anxious or aroused which leads to emotional instability
  • define psychoticism
    tendency toward aggression, cruelty and antisocial behaviour
  • explain eysenck's theory of criminal personality
    • criminals score high on extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism
    • individuals have a lower level of conditioning and less responsive to punishment
    • less likely to learn socially acceptable behaviours
  • what do cognitive explanations focus on?
    individual's thought patterns and mental processes
  • what are the 2 cognitive explanations?
    1. kohlberg's level of moral reasoning
    2. cognitive distortions
  • outline kohlberg's level of moral reasoning
    offenders operate at pre-conventional morality rather than higher stages of moral reasoning
  • define pre-conventional level
    individuals justify their crimes by focusing on the benefit to themselves or avoiding punishment
  • define post-conventional level
    actions are based on universal ethical principles
  • outline cognitive distortions
    • hostile attribution bias - interpret ambiguous situations as aggressive or threatening
    • minimisation - downplay seriousness of crimes and rationalise behaviour to reduce feelings of guilt or shame
  • who proposed the differential association theory?
    sutherland
  • main assumption of the differential association theory
    criminals are exposed to pro-criminal attitudes and values
  • key concepts of the differential association theory
    • frequency - more exposure to criminal attitudes, more likely to engage in criminality
    • duration - longer exposure, more likely it will be adopted
    • priority - early associations are more influential
    • intensity - greater importance of source, the stronger the impact
  • what is the psychodynamic explanation based on?
    freud
  • main assumption of the psychodynamic explanation
    unconscious conflicts and early childhood shapes criminal behaviour
  • key concepts of the psychodynamic explanation
    • id - unconscious part of personality, responsible for desires and impulses
    • ego - rational part that mediates between the id and reality
    • superego - moral conscience, developed through socialisation
  • explain the role of the id, ego and superego in criminal behaviour
    • dysfunctional superego fails to regulate the id's impulses which leads to criminal behaviour
  • strength of eysenck's theory - evidence
    • empirical support
    • eysenck & eysenck - criminals score higher on E, N and P compared to non-criminals
    • personality traits are linked to offending behaviour
  • weakness of eysenck's theory - incomplete
    • oversimplification
    • ignores social, economic and environmental influences
    • biological determinism
  • weakness of eysenck's theory - validity
    • methodological issues
    • use of self-report methods and correlational data
    • social desirability bias
  • strength of cognitive distortions - relevance
    • practical application to treatment
    • loza & loza-fanous - offenders receiving CBT showed improvements in self-control and reduced criminal thinking
    • helps prevent reoffending
  • weakness of cognitive distortions - causality
    • reliant on thought patterns
    • ignores socioeconomic status, trauma and peer influence
    • limited causality
  • weakness of cognitive distortions - effectiveness
    • cultural bias
    • hostile attribution bias and minimisation are based on western models of psychological development
    • limits generalisability
  • strength of differential association theory - evidence
    • empirical support
    • shaw & mckay - crime is higher in areas with high levels of social disorganisation
    • criminal behaviour is learned through interactions and associations
  • weakness of the differential association theory - simplistic
    • overemphasised social learning
    • underestimates individual differences e.g. genetics or personality
    • doesn't account for complexity
  • weakness of the differential association theory - limited
    • doesn't account for cultural and situational variations
    • some cultures have types of crime that are acceptable whilst in others they are discouraged
    • less applicable
  • strength of the psychodynamic explanation - insight
    • valuable insight into early childhood
    • criminal behaviour results from unresolved conflicts between id, ego and superego that developed during childhood
    • deep understanding of impact
  • weakness of the psychodynamic explanation - evidence
    • lack of empirical support
    • based on subjective case studies which lack scientific evidence
    • difficulty with falsifiability
  • weakness of the psychodynamic explanation - incomplete
    • overemphasis on internal conflicts
    • neglects important social and environmental factors
    • fails to be comprehensive