Save
...
psych paper 3
forensic psychology
biological explanations for offending
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
grace sawtell
Visit profile
Cards (23)
what do biological explanations suggest criminal behaviour is caused by?
genetic
,
neurological
and
physiological
factors
what are the 3 biological explanations?
historical
approach (
atavistic
form)
genetic
explanations
neural
explanations
who proposed the atavistic form?
lombroso
outline atavistic form
criminals are
genetic throwbacks
identified by
physical
features
criminals are
biologically
different from non-criminals
lack
evolutionary
development
examples of atavistic characteristics
high
cheekbones
asymmetrical
face
large
jaw
dark
skin
long
arms
outline what traits lombroso identified specifically to types of criminals
murderers -
bloodshot
eyes,
curly
hair and
long
ears
sexual offenders -
thick
lips and
protruding
ears
fraudsters -
thin
lips and
sharp
nose
what do genetic explanations propose?
behaviour is
heritable
outline twin studies as part of genetic explanations
Christiansen
3,500
twins in denmark
52
% concordance with MZ twins and
22
% in DZ twins
outline adoption studies as part of the genetic explanation
Mednick
et al
14,000
adopted children in denmark
criminal convictions in
biological
parents
increased
likelihood of criminality in
adopted
children
outline candidate genes as part of the genetic explanation
MAOA
- regulates
dopamine
and
serotonin
, linked to
aggressive
behaviour
CDH13
- linked to
substance abuse
and
ADHD
what do neural explanations suggest about criminal behaviour?
linked to brain
abnormalities
link prefrontal cortex with criminal behaviour
responsible for
decision-making
,
impulse
control and
morality
Raine
et al - murderers have
reduced
activity which is linked to
impulsivity
and
aggression
link the limbic system with criminal behaviour
amygdala
regulates
emotions
reduced activity is linked to a lack of
empathy
Raine
et al - violent offenders had
asymmetrical
amygdala activity leading to
emotional dysfunction
link neurotransmitters with criminal behaviour
low
serotonin
=
impulsivity
and
aggression
high
dopamine
=
reward-seeking
behaviour
low
cortisol
= reduces
stress
which makes individuals less
fearful
strength of the atavistic form - development
pioneered
scientific
criminology
suggested the role of
biological
factors and
physical
characteristics
scientific approach of
objective
and
measurable
traits
weakness of atavistic form - unscientific
flawed
research methodology
tested without a
control
group and
biased
sample of prisoners
lack of
empirical
support
weakness of atavistic form - stereotypes
links criminality to
racial
and
ethnic
characteristics
physical traits of
dark skin
or
protruding jaws
reflect
ethnocentric
bias
strength of genetic explanation - evidence
Christiansen
- MZ twins have a
higher
concordance rate than DZ twins
Mednick
et al - adopted children were
more
likely to engage in criminality if biological parent had criminal record
strong
empirical
support
strength of genetic explanation - contribution
identification
of specific genes (
MAOA
and
CDH13
)
Brunner
et al - men with defective
MAOA
gene exhibited
violent
criminal behaviour
insight into
biological
mechanisms
weakness of genetic explanation - narrow
suggests individuals are
predisposed
to criminal behaviour
ignores complexity of
upbringing
,
socio-economic
status and
peer
influence
reductionist
and
deterministic
strength of neural explanation - evidence
scientific
evidence
Raine
et al - used
PET
scans to show
reduced
activity of
prefrontal cortex
in murderers
brain abnormalities contribute to criminal behaviour
strength of neural explanation - practical
real-world
application
neuropsychological
interventions and
pharmacological
treatments
treatment
and
prevention
weakness of neural explanation - incomplete
relies on
correlational
evidence
no evidence that brain abnormality
directly
causes criminal behaviour
lacks
explanatory
power