biological explanations for offending

Cards (23)

  • what do biological explanations suggest criminal behaviour is caused by?
    genetic, neurological and physiological factors
  • what are the 3 biological explanations?
    1. historical approach (atavistic form)
    2. genetic explanations
    3. neural explanations
  • who proposed the atavistic form?
    lombroso
  • outline atavistic form
    • criminals are genetic throwbacks
    • identified by physical features
    • criminals are biologically different from non-criminals
    • lack evolutionary development
  • examples of atavistic characteristics
    • high cheekbones
    • asymmetrical face
    • large jaw
    • dark skin
    • long arms
  • outline what traits lombroso identified specifically to types of criminals
    • murderers - bloodshot eyes, curly hair and long ears
    • sexual offenders - thick lips and protruding ears
    • fraudsters - thin lips and sharp nose
  • what do genetic explanations propose?
    behaviour is heritable
  • outline twin studies as part of genetic explanations
    Christiansen
    • 3,500 twins in denmark
    • 52% concordance with MZ twins and 22% in DZ twins
  • outline adoption studies as part of the genetic explanation
    Mednick et al
    • 14,000 adopted children in denmark
    • criminal convictions in biological parents increased likelihood of criminality in adopted children
  • outline candidate genes as part of the genetic explanation
    • MAOA - regulates dopamine and serotonin, linked to aggressive behaviour
    • CDH13 - linked to substance abuse and ADHD
  • what do neural explanations suggest about criminal behaviour?
    linked to brain abnormalities
  • link prefrontal cortex with criminal behaviour
    • responsible for decision-making, impulse control and morality
    Raine et al - murderers have reduced activity which is linked to impulsivity and aggression
  • link the limbic system with criminal behaviour
    • amygdala regulates emotions
    • reduced activity is linked to a lack of empathy
    Raine et al - violent offenders had asymmetrical amygdala activity leading to emotional dysfunction
  • link neurotransmitters with criminal behaviour
    • low serotonin = impulsivity and aggression
    • high dopamine = reward-seeking behaviour
    • low cortisol = reduces stress which makes individuals less fearful
  • strength of the atavistic form - development
    • pioneered scientific criminology
    • suggested the role of biological factors and physical characteristics
    • scientific approach of objective and measurable traits
  • weakness of atavistic form - unscientific
    • flawed research methodology
    • tested without a control group and biased sample of prisoners
    • lack of empirical support
  • weakness of atavistic form - stereotypes
    • links criminality to racial and ethnic characteristics
    • physical traits of dark skin or protruding jaws
    • reflect ethnocentric bias
  • strength of genetic explanation - evidence
    • Christiansen - MZ twins have a higher concordance rate than DZ twins
    • Mednick et al - adopted children were more likely to engage in criminality if biological parent had criminal record
    • strong empirical support
  • strength of genetic explanation - contribution
    • identification of specific genes (MAOA and CDH13)
    • Brunner et al - men with defective MAOA gene exhibited violent criminal behaviour
    • insight into biological mechanisms
  • weakness of genetic explanation - narrow
    • suggests individuals are predisposed to criminal behaviour
    • ignores complexity of upbringing, socio-economic status and peer influence
    • reductionist and deterministic
  • strength of neural explanation - evidence
    • scientific evidence
    • Raine et al - used PET scans to show reduced activity of prefrontal cortex in murderers
    • brain abnormalities contribute to criminal behaviour
  • strength of neural explanation - practical
    • real-world application
    • neuropsychological interventions and pharmacological treatments
    • treatment and prevention
  • weakness of neural explanation - incomplete
    • relies on correlational evidence
    • no evidence that brain abnormality directly causes criminal behaviour
    • lacks explanatory power