Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder experienced by 1% of the world
we identify schizophrenia by clusteringsymptoms
the two systems for classification of a disorder are ICD-10 and DSM-5
DSM-5 only classifies using positive symptoms
ICD-10 uses two or more negative symptoms to classify schizophrenia
positive symptoms are additional experiences such as hallucinations and delusions
negative symptoms involve a loss of a usual abilities and experiences such as speech poverty and abolition.
speechpoverty is changes in speech patterns
avolition is finding it difficult to keep up with goal directed activity
Issues in diagnosis and classification
strength : good reliability
consistent
different clinicians reach the same diagnosis for the same induvidual (inter rater reliability)
Issues in diagnosis and classification
limitation : low validity
whether we assess what we are trying to assess
psychologist has two psychiatrist independently diagnose 100 patients using the two manuals
68 diagnosed under ICD and 39 under DSM
either over or under diagnosed depending on classification system
Issues in diagnosis and classification
limitation : co-morbidity
Sz often diagnosed with other conditions
Sz may not be as distinct a condition and makes a problem with diagnostic
Issues in diagnosis and classification
limitation : gender bias in diagnosis
1980’s men have been diagnosed with Sz more commonly then women
women less vulnerable than men - maybe because of genetic factors
women may not be receiving treatment required —> as they function better
Issues in diagnosis and classification
limitation : culture bias
symptoms in Sz have different meanings in other cultures
hearing voices
over interpretation in black British people (Escobar) = discriminated in the diagnostic system
Issues in diagnosis and classification
limitation : symptom overlap
symptoms overlap with other conditions
Sz and bipolar disorder involve positive and negative symptoms
suggests that they may be variation of singular condition
hard to diagnose
Family studies
confirmed an increased risk due to genetics
Gottesmen
48% chance to develop if an identical twin suffers
correlation as most families share similar environments
Candidate genes
polygenic - number of different genes are involved
aetiologically heterogeneous meaning different combinations of genes can develop the disorder
Ripke - meta analysis - 37000 people with Sz compared with control group
what is it called when different combination of gene scan cause a condition?
aetiologically heterogenous
what is the term for when a number of genes are involved in a condition?
Polygenic
the role of a mutation :
could be caused by a mutation in parentalDNA
evidence from positive correlations between paternal age and risk of Sz (Brown)
OG dopamine hypothesis
discovery = drugs used to treat Parkinson’s disease help Sz patients
Sz might be due to high levels of dopamine in subcortical regions of the brain = hyperdopaminergia
Updated dopamine hypothesis
addition of hypodopaminergia = low levels of dopamine in the brain
Howes - genetic variations and early experiences of stress (both psychological + physical) make someone more sensitive to cortical hypopaminergia and hyperdominergia
genetic basis evaluation
research support = strength
gottesman - risk increases with genetic similarity to family members
tienari - biological children of parents with Sz are at heightened risk even growing up with adoptive parents
Hilker - showed concordance rates of 33% for identical twins and 7% for nonidentical twins
genetic basis evaluation
environmental factors - limitation
environmental factors also increase the risk
both biological and psychological influences
include - birth complications + smoking cannabis + childhood trauma = more vulnerable
Neural correlates evaluation
evidence for dopamine [DA] - strength
Drugs that increase DA = worsen symptoms
Drugs that reduce DA = reduceintensity of symptoms
Some candidate genes act on the production of DA and DA receptors
Neural correlates evaluation
glutamate - limitation
postmortem + live scanning studies show raised levels of glutamate up several brain regions
several candidate genes for Sz are believed to be involved in glutamate production + processing
Family dysfunction - schizophrenic mother
Fromm-Reichmann proposed this idea
meant to be coldrejecting and controlling
family climate = tense —> distrust which can lead to paranoia and delusions
Family dysfunction - Double~blind theory
Bateson agreed with family climate is the onset to Sz
find themselves trapped in situations where they think they are always doing wrong
when wrong = often, they are punished by withdrawal of love
understanding of world is confusing = disorganised thinking and paranoid delusions
family dysfunction - expressed emotion
emotion expressed towards patients = negative emotion
verbal criticism
hostility
emotional over involvement
source of stress that can trigger onset
cognitive explanations - dysfunctional thinking
disruption to the normal thought process
reduced though process in the ventralstriatum is associated w/ negative symptoms
reduced processing in the temporal and cigulategyri are associated w/ hallucinations
cognitive explantations - meta representation dysfunction
inability
to reflect on thoughts and behaviour
to insight own intentions and goals
To interpret actions of others
explains voices + hallucinations + delusions
Cognitive explanations : central control dysfunction
Inability to suppress automated thoughts
Inability to suppress speech triggered by other thoughts
Explains speechpoverty
Evaluation - family dysfunction
research support
Read et al
adults with Sz more likely to be insecurely attached
69% women + 59% men with Sz have a history of physical + sexual abuse
more research
most adults with Sz report at least one childhood trauma
Evaluation - family dysfunction
Explanations lack support
No evidence on Sz mothers and double blind
based on clinical observations and informal assessment of personalities of mothers = no systematic evidence
Measured patterns in communications of family’s w/ and w/o a sz child —> no difference
Evaluation - family dysfunction
family blaming - limitation
explanations blame onset onto families
already suffering w/ a child with Sz then getting blamed for the condition
Evaluation - cognitive explanations
research support
Stirling
compared cognitive tasks performed by 60 people w and w/o Sz
Sz patients took twice as long to complete the task —> central control dysfunction
Evaluation - cognitive explanations
proximal explanation
Only explain proximal origins of symptoms (what is happening now)
doesn’t link between the origins to what is happening now such as childhood trauma —> dysfunctional thinking
Evaluation - cognitive explanations
reductionist
Ignores other factors and explains a complex disorder through dysfunctional thinking
many others layers that form this disorder cannot look at them as separate parts
What drugs are most commonly used to treat Sz?
antipsychotics
A person with psychosis experiences some loss of contact with reality