types of data and collection

Cards (7)

  • qualitative data
    • expressed in words
    • gathering data concerning thoughts and feelings
    • produces highly detailed and meaningful info
    • collected from: unstructured interviews, case studies, open questionnaires, some observational studies
  • drawing conclusions from qualitative research
    • categorise data - use pre existing categories chosen before research or use emergent categories which emerge from examining data
    • summarise data within those categories - list categories (quote examples or tally them)
    • very detailed and meaningful, high validity
    • difficult to replicate, difficult to analyse
  • quantitative research
    • focuses on numerical data
    • less meaningful
    • info more narrowly focused
    • collected from: experiments, correlational studies, structured observations, structured interviews and closed questionnaires
    • easy to analyse, can replicate, more objective
    • less meaningful, low ecological validity
  • qualitative to quantitative
    • qualitative data can be converted into quantitative data
    • responses from an interview can be categorised and then certain types of behaviour can be counted
  • primary data 

    • information observed or collected directly from first hand experience - data collected would be specifically related to the aims of the study
    • researcher has control over data, applicable data
    • lengthly and therefore expensive
  • secondary data 

    • information that was collected for a reason other than the current one
    • this data already exists and has been collected by someone else
    • researcher may use government statistics or make sure of data held by other institutions
    • easier and cheaper, less time consuming
    • from some studies the data may not fit the needs of the study, data may be outdated
  • meta analysis
    • types of secondary data that involves combining data from a large number of studies
    • effect size is calculated
    • tells us how strong the relationship between 2 variables is
    • increases validity of conclusions, sample is larger than the original
    • publication bias - researcher may not select all relevant studies which will lower validity