What is another weakness(Rutter)
-Rutter (1976) argues that Bowlby muddled deprivation with privation and that the long term effect associated with deprivation was more likely to have been caused by privation
-therefore it may be dude to the fact that the children have never formed an attachment rather than having one and it being broken
-This suggests that Bowlby may have placed too much cause on the effects of deprivation on children's development