Ethics

Subdecks (1)

Cards (1468)

  • According to CD1, what must you observe in the administration of justice?
    Your duty to the court
  • What does the duty to the court require you to act with?
    Independence in the interests of justice
  • What type of obligations does the duty to the court override?
    Inconsistent obligations
  • What specific conduct does the duty to the court prohibit?
    Knowingly or recklessly misleading the court
  • According to the study material, what must you not do regarding statements to the court?
    Make untrue or misleading statements
  • What must you not do when asking questions, according to the study material?
    Suggest untrue or misleading facts
  • What must you do if you know evidence is untrue, according to the study material?
    Make the true position clear
  • What does knowingly misleading the court include, according to the study material?
    Being complicit in another person misleading the court
  • What happens if you inadvertently mislead the court?
    You must correct the position
  • For how long does the duty to the court apply?
    The duration of the case
  • Which duty does your duty to the court override?
    Your duty to act in your client's best interests
  • What should you do if disclosing confidential information would prevent the court from being misled?
    Seek the client's permission to disclose
  • What must you do if a client refuses to allow you to disclose confidential information that would prevent the court from being misled?
    Cease to act and return instructions
  • What action must you take if you discover your client possesses an undisclosed document?
    Cease to act and return instructions
  • According to the study material, what must you not do as an advocate?
    Abuse your role as an advocate
  • What is forbidden, according to the study material, regarding insulting statements?
    Making statements to insult a witness
  • Under what conditions can you make serious allegations against a witness you have had the opportunity to cross-examine?
    If the allegation was put in cross-examination
  • When can you make a serious allegation against any person?
    If there are reasonable grounds
  • Besides reasonable grounds, what else is needed when making an allegation against any person?
    The allegation is relevant
  • In court, must third parties be named in allegations?
    Avoid naming them unless reasonably necessary
  • When can you give a personal opinion of the facts or the law?
    If invited by the court
  • What constitutes a breach of your duty to the Court under CD1?
    Not avoiding wasting the court's time
  • What authorities must the court be aware of?
    All relevant authorities
  • What is the term for doing work in a case for a more senior member of chambers?
    Devilling
  • What should you consider regarding legal representation?
    Whether client's best interests are served
  • Your duty under CD 2 may require you to advise a client to be represented by whom?
    Different legal representative
  • When may you accept instructions for more than one client?
    If you act in the best interests of each
  • If you cannot act in the best interests of each of multiple clients, what must you do?
    Advise the client to seek different representation
  • What duty does a competent standard of work and service include?
    To inform of inability to carry out instructions
  • In the event you won't be able to carry out your instructions in time, what should you ensure?
    Sufficient time to protect client interests
  • What does effective communication require when attempting to prevent hearing clashes?
    Communication with the court
  • What does effective diary management require when attempting to prevent hearing clashes?
    Diary management
  • In the event of unavoidable hearing clashes, what must you exercise?
    Professional judgement
  • What should you take direction from if appropriate when deciding on hearing precedence?
    The Court
  • According to CD2, what should you consider regarding which hearing to attend?
    Which client is more prejudiced
  • Besides the effect on the client, what else should you consider?
    The needs of vulnerable clients
  • When deciding which hearing to attend, how should you consider the length of time you have been instructed on each case?
    Consider all relevant circumstances of each case
  • When deciding which hearing to attend, how should you consider the complexity of each case?
    Consider all relevant circumstances of each case
  • When deciding which hearing to attend, how should you consider the amount of work you have already done on each case?
    Consider all relevant circumstances of each case
  • When deciding which hearing to attend, how should you consider the likely impact on each client?
    Consider all relevant circumstances of each case