looking at the content of something and analysing it.
Observational study when behaviour is studied indirectly in written/verbal material.
Could be quantitative/qualitative analysis
state the steps involved in a content analysis
sampling method- time/event/systematic/stratified random sampling- relate to question
coding- placing qualitative/quantitative data into categories like behavioural ones
method of representing data- describe examples of each category (qualitative) count instances (quantitative)
what is meant by a thematic analysis?
analysis of qualitative data. Themes and categories are identified and data is organised according to these themes
briefly describe how you would conduct a thematic analysis
understand meaning communicated and perspective of participants. No notes should be made
break data down into meaningful units
assign a label/code- initial categories, each unit may be given more than one code/method
combine codes into larger categories
test categories by collecting new set of data and using categories to analyse it. Should fit the new data well if they represent the topic area investigated
what are the purposes of a thematic analysis?
propose order on data
ensure order represents pps perspectives
enable general conclusions to be drawn and themes identified
two advantages and disadvantages of content analysis?
😊high ecological validity- based on observations on what people do in real life
😊can be replicated if the sources can be accessed by others, so can be tested for reliability
☹️observer bias- reduces objectivity because different observers may interpret things differently
☹️cultural bias- interpretation of material will be affected by culture/language of observer, also behavioural categories will be affected
what is a case study?
in-depth study of a person/group of people over time
carried out in the real world
individualistic
what are the strengths and weaknesses of case studies?
😊presents researchers with in-depth information about complex interactions
😊can investigate rare behaviours
☹️researcher's could get to know individual well- lack of objectivity
☹️difficult to replicate- lacks reliability
☹️ethical issues- trauma related to scrutiny/in depth study of an individual