Save
Psychology
Attachment
Cultural variations
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Katie Eyley
Visit profile
Cards (13)
Individualistic culture
western cultures
Value
independence
and individuality
Collectivist culture
e.g. Japan and
China
Value interdependence - dependant on each other
Importance of the group
Extent to which things are shared - groups live together, share tasks, childrearing and belongings
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) meta-analysis
examined
32
studies in 8 countries where the strange situation had been used
Had data from around
2000
children
Results combined from the studies but were weighted for sample size
Findings :
In all countries -
secure attachment
was the most common classification
However - it varied (75% in Britain, 50% in China).
Insecure-Resistant
was the least common
Avoidant attachment was more common in
West Germany
but rare in
Israel
and
Japan
.
Variation within cultures was
1.5x
greater than the variation between cultures
E.g. in USA one study found
46%
securely attached, another found
90%
Conclusion:
The global pattern across cultures appears to be similar to what was found in the
US
.
Supports the idea that
secure attachment
is best for
healthy
(social and emotional) development.
Cross cultural similarities support the view that attachment is an innate and biological process.
Cross Cultural similarities :
Tronick
et
al
Africa
Studied an African tribe
Infants looked after and breastfed by different women but slept with their own mother
Infants still showed one primary attachment
Cross cultural differences - Grossman
Grossmann
and Grossmann (
1991
)
Germany
German infants classified as
insecurely attached
.
German culture involves keeping interpersonal distance.
Infants do not engage in proximity seeking behaviour in Strange Situation – therefore labelled insecurely attached.
This is because they are encouraged to act independently
Cross cultural differences - Takshashi
Japan
Found similar rates of secure attachment in Japanese infants to
US
infants
Japanese infants showed no evidence of insecure-avoidant attachment
High rates of insecure-resistant attachment
Infants distressed being left alone (for
90%
of infants the study had to be stopped).
Explained by different childcare practice – in japan infants rarely experience separation from their mother
Therefore appear insecurely attached in the
Strange Situation
.
Conclusions
Studies suggest despite the fact that there are
cultural
variations in
infant
care,
attachments
are still formed with the infants
mother
.
Research
shows that there are differences in the patterns of attachment
These can be related to differences in cultural attitudes and child rearing.
Strength - use of indigenous researchers
indigenous researchers are from the same cultural background as the ppts
This helps
communication
between researchers and
participants
and helps prevent misunderstandings e.g. of
instructions
Removes
language barriers
This means that there is a good chance that researchers and participants communicated successfully
This increasing the
validity
of the study
Counter point of indigenous researchers AO3:
The use of these researchers isn’t true for all of the research
E.g. Americans
Morelli
and
Tronick
investigated the
Efe
in Zaire
This means that some cross cultural research may have communication errors hence lacks validity
Weakness - confounding variables
Studies conducted in different countries may not be matched for sample characteristics
e.g. may use children of different ages and social classes
Environmental variables - may differ
e.g. using smaller rooms which might encourage babies to explore more
This means that studies assessing attachment types carried out in different countries may tell us little about cultural differences in attachment
Weakness - imposed etic
Using a test (the
Strange Situation
) in a different cultural context from the one it was designed for (America) may be meaningless
Strange Situation was designed in the USA where lack of affection at reunion represents insecure attachment.
However- in Germany it would be seen as a sign of independence, which is desired.
This means that sit may be meaningless to compare attachment behaviours across countries
This is known as imposed etic