case studies

Cards (7)

  • describe a case study
    • a case study as in-depth study of one person/small group of people
    • it is carried in the real world
    • case studies are typically longitudinal in that they are carried out over a period of time
    • they are so typically conducted by a single researcher
    • the researcher uses a range of methods to collect their data
  • what range of methods do researchers use to collect their data
    • observations
    • interviews
    • psychological tests (IQ testing)
  • why is small sample sizes a limitation of case studies
    • case studies investigate the unique situations of one person or a small group of people
    • it may be difficult to generalise the findings to the wider population
    • question the population validity of findings from case studies.
  • what is a strength of case studies as they are conducted in the real world
    • they are typically conducted in the setting in which the behaviour being investigated would naturally occur
    • it means the participant(s) may be more likely to behave naturally
    • adds to the ecological validity of findings from case studies.
  • describe the limitation of how case studies are difficult to replicate
    • they are typically longitudinal pieces of research carried out over a number of years.
    • the research is unlikely to be replicated to check the consistency of the findings
    • question the reliability of findings produced by case studies
  • descibe the limitation of case studies due to researcher bias
    • single researcher and also typically use methods such as interviews which require subjective interpretation by the researcher.
    • researcher may be subjective in their recording and analysis of the data
    • question the objectivity and, in turn, the validity of the research.
  • describe a strength of case studies as the data obtained can be cross checked
    • multiple ways of collecting data are used and so a researcher could assess whether answers provided in a questionnaire are consistent with a covert observation of the same participants.
    • the data do not match, it may indicate that social desirability bias was an issue with the questionnaire.
    • adds to the validity of findings from case studies.