Baddeley gave his PPs four different word lists, giving them a few seconds to try and memorise the words before taking away the list and asking them to recall what they remember.
Strength:
reliability - standardised procedures meant it could be replicated (all PPs were given the same amount of time for STM and LTM to recall memory)
Weaknesses:
lacked ecological validity - artificial stimuli
Baddeley's findings for STM
Our STM is mainly encoded acoustically
we are worse with recalling similarly sounding words when immediately recalled
suggests STM encodes information based on sound as the similar-sounding words can interfere which makes them harder to recall (therefore gets confused in our STM)
LTM - Baddeley, 1996
He asked PPs to recall after 20 mins (LTM recall).
Strength:
reliable - consistency = standardised procedures e.g. all PPs given the same time
Weakness:
only tested one type of LTM - lacks validity
Baddeley's findings for LTM
Our LTM is mainly encoded semantically.
we are worse with recalling semantically similar words
LTM stores memory based on meaning so words with similar meanings can overlap and cause confusion overtime, making them harder to recall later on