Multi-Store Model of Memory

Cards (8)

  • Sensory Register
    capacity = high
    duration = 250ms - 4s
    encoding = iconic, echoic
    (disregarded info is removed before reaching STM)
    (by paying attention info moves into the STM)
  • STM
    capacity = 7+-2
    duration = <30s
    encoding = acoustic
    (memory can be forgotten through decay or displacement)
    (prolonged elaborative rehearsal changes STM to LTM)
  • LTM
    capacity = unlimited
    duration = potential lifetime
    encoding = mainly semantic
    (retrieval changes back to STM)
    (maintenance rehearsal changes back to STM)
  • Strength - research support for existence of structurally separate stores
    Glanzer and Cunitz
    showed recency effect is disrupted when an interference task is introduced
    found the last 2-3 items on a word list were lost from STM but earlier items were remembered as they were already in LTM
    therefore support MSM as it shows the STM and LTM are separate, also showed the importance of rehearsal
  • Strength - further support by case studies
    H.M. (Milner et al)
    STM - intact
    LTM - affected
    - justifies the MSM as STM isn't affected but LTM has been affected -> separate
    suffered intractable epilepsy -> medical temporal lobe surgery
    Clive Wearing
    7s memory
    STM - damaged
    LTM - affected significantly
    - justifies the MSM as LTM is completely gone due to 7s memory but STM is still somewhat intact -> never could learn anything new.
    no STM = no rehearsal so no LTM (linear)
  • Weakness - contradiction of MSM
    KF
    STM - bad (verbal, worst, visual but too bad)
    LTM - intact
    his LTM worked even though STM was damaged and model says this shouldn't be possible
  • Weakness - overly simplistic
    MSM is based on research that suggests STM and LTM are unitary stores that work separately and independently of each other.
    however, there's a lots of research (e.g. Tulving) to suggest that there are different types of LTM.
    e.g. there are separate LTMs for events, facts and skills like riding a bike
    suggests that LTM isn't a single unitary store and there are at least 3 different types of LTM, limiting the validity of the model at explaining the complexity of human memory
  • Weakness - not all research evidence supports the idea STM and LTM operate independently
    Shallice and Warrington reported the case study of KF who suffered brain damage which led to difficulty in dealing with verbal info but who could still process visual info normally.
    Schachter et la suggests that evidence from amnesiacs suggests there are 4 different LTMs rather than just one.
    suggests the MSM may be too simplistic and inflexible to explain the entire memory system