The learning theory of attachment says that children form attachments based on primarycare [ feeding ], it is a behaviourist theory
In the SLT of attachment, the child associates the caregiverwithfood, so shows a positiveresponsewhenaround the caregiver [ classical conditioning ]
In the SLT of attachment, the child learns that an attachment will lead to food / attention, [ positivereinforcement ]
The caregiver benefits from the attachment by gainingthebaby'saffection [ positivereinforcement ] and stopping the babyfromcrying [ negativereinforcement]
Hunger is the primarydrive in children, attachment is a secondarydrive by association of caregiver with food
A weakness of the SLT of attachment is that research suggests that the quality of attachment is improved with higherlevelsofreciprocity / interactionalsynchrony. There are othervariables not considered by the theory, it is reductionist
A strength of the SLT for attachment is Hay and Vespos theory [1988] that attachment is learntthroughparentsmodellingbehaviour and then rewardingattachmentbehaviour shown by the baby. Babies learn through operant conditioning even if food is notprimarydrive