Variables affecting conformity include: group size, unanimity & task difficulty- investigated by Asch.
Asch Line Length Study (1956):
123 male undergraduates.
Groups of 7-9, but only one was an actual PP.
Were shown 3 different line lengths on 18 different slides & asked which of the lines were the same as the standard line.
Actors gave the same incorrect answer on 12/18 trials.
Wanted to investigate whether PPs would go along with the confederates & say the obviously incorrect answer (eg comply with the group).
Asch Line Length Study (1956) Findings:
When actors gave wrong answer, PPs went along with it nearly 33% of the time.
When actors gave the right answer, the PPs made almost no errors.
Of the PPs, 75% conformed at least once & 25% did not conform.
Of them, 5% conformed every time.
Conclusion: most people will comply to the group to avoid disapproval, even when the right answer is obvious.
Asch carried out variations of his original study & found the following affected the rates of conformity:
The size of the majority group- 3 confederates led to 33% rate of conformity.
The unanimity of majority- how much of the group agrees- with just 1 other person saying correct answer, conformity rate dropped to 5.5% from 33% (when group disagrees with each other, it becomes less influential).
The difficulty of the task- made lines more similar, increased conformity, but this time its Informational Social Influence rather than Normative Social Influence.
Evaluation for Variables Affecting Conformity- Weakness:
Asch's study is only valid to the time it was conducted in- high levels of conformity were only found because of the cultural time-frame it was conducted in.
In 1950's America, the fear of communism was high (people more likely to stick with the majority).
Indicates that Asch's results are not generalisable.
Evaluation for Variables Affecting Conformity- Weakness:
Modern research has failed to replicate Asch's findings- Perrin & Spencer (1980) repeated the Asch study in Britain & found only 1 conforming response from 396 trials.
Supports the claim that Asch's results are not generalisable.
Evaluation for Variables Affecting Conformity- Weakness:
There are methodological issues with Asch's study- sample bias (all American, male, undergraduates) & task & setting are unrealistic.
These reduce the validity of Asch's study & therefore make the results ungeneralisable.
Evaluation for Variables Affecting Conformity- Weakness:
Are ethical issues with Asch's study- PPs given a task that made them question their own judgement, this provides the potential for psychological harm.
It's argued that we should not use the conclusions of unethical research & Asch's research should therefore be disregarded.