One limitation of research into the role of fathers is lack of clarity over the question being asked.
Some researchers attempting to answer this question want to understand the role of fathers as secondary attachment figures
Whilst others are more concerned with fathers as a primary attachment figure
Makes it difficult to offer a simple answer as to the 'role of the father' as it depends what specific role is being discussed
Studies understanding the role of the father as secondary attachment figures have tended to see fathers as behaving differently from mothers and having a distinct role
Studies concerned with fathers as primary attachment figures have found that fathers can take on a 'maternal' role
What did longitudinal studies by Grossmann et al. suggest about fathers?
A counterpoint to McCallum and Golombok's argument
These lines of research may not in fact be in conflict
It could be that fathers typically take on distinctive roles in two-parent heterosexual families, BUT that parents in single-mother and lesbian-parent families simply adapt to accommodate the role played by fathers
This means that the question of a distinctive role for fathers is clear after all
When present, fathers tend to adopt a distinctive role, but families can adapt to not having a father
What is one strength of research into the role of the father?