Pingree (1978) - genderstereotypingreducedamongschool-agedgirls when shownTVadverts of women in non-stereotypicalroles
C.A. for role played by counter-stereotypical models
HoweverPingree (1978) found in the samestudy that pre-adolescentboysdisplayedstrongerstereotypes after exposure to the non-traditionalmodels / counter-stereotypes
It is possible that this ‘backlash‘occurs because boys of that agewant to maintain a view that rancounter to the adultview
This ultimately suggests there are significantgenderdifferences in children’sperception of their own and the oppositegender‘straditionalstereotype and role
Strength = research support
Establishing a causal relationship between TV and subsequentbehaviours is difficult
Town in Canadaprovidesresearchers with uniqueopportunity to examine this
The towncode named Notel could notgetTV as it was situated in a remotevalley
Williams (1985) - longitudinal, naturalisticstudy on the town and a town with a singleTVchannel (Unitel) and one with 4broadcastchannels and cable (Multitel)
StudiedtownsbeforeTVcame to Notel and after it had TV for 2 years
Foundchildren’sviews and behaviours were moresex-stereotypedpostTVintroduction
Limitation = correlation not causation
Factthose who spendmoretime on social media, TV and videogames hold strongergender-stereotypedbeliefs = correlational
Durkin (1985) - veryyoungchildren are notpassive and uncriticalrecipients of mediamessages
Norms in child’sfamily may be biggerdeterminant on gender attitudes and behaviour
If mediarepresentationsconfirmexistinggenderattitudes of child they are likely to be reinforced in their mind = media is secondary to otherinfluences
Significantgenderdevelopmentoccursbefore the age of 4 when mediainfluences are weaker